The objective of this work was to evaluate two different laboratory methods for determining the saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ko), namely, the constant head permeameter method (PCC) and the falling decreasing head permeameter method (PCD) and their applicability and variability to Amazon soils. 125 undisturbed soil samples were collected with an Uhland soil sampler using volumetric rings of 0,072 m height and 0,069 m in diameter. Soil porosity was also estimated by volumetric ring samples collected at the same spots where Ko was evaluated. Disturbed soil samples were also collected for chemical and particle size analysis at the same spots. The results showed that the PCC method was more appropriate for the studied soils Oxisols, leading to the lowest coefficient of variation and standard deviation throughout the topographic sequence. The Ko values were distributed among P1(2,65 to 3,34 cm day-1), P2(2,85 to 3,38 cm day-1), P3(2,86 to 3,63 cm day-1), P4(2,75 to 3,49 cm day-1), P5(2,38 to 3,83 cm day-1) and P6 (2,47 to 3,52 cm day-1); having a tendency to show higher Ko values at soil surface. The use of Ko as a parameter for hydraulic analysis in soils with high porosity in the surface layer and high clay content in the subsoil, as is the case in the Amazon, must be undertaken with caution to avoid compacting the sample and porous discontinuities. Throughout the studied topographic sequence, changes of saturated hydraulic conductivity were more related to changes in soil physical properties than to changes in vegetation cover throughout the studied topographic sequence.
|
