The present dissertation, forged in a bibliographical research, seeks to critically analyze the
drug policy in the country. It is known that far from solving the problem the current policy on
drug trafficking has contributed to the marginalization of certain social the strength of the
penal system. The number of prisoners, due to convictions for trafficking, and the profile of
these segregated people (poor and poorly educated), shows that the current model can not
reach its goal. Given this mosaic, this research sought to propose a paradigm shift in the
treatment of trafficking capable of opposing common sense, reinforcing the idea that the
solution of the problem should not necessarily pass through the criminal system and that
policies aimed at drug treatment need to be scaled up so that spending is focused on programs
for the prevention and treatment of addiction. At the same time it was concluded that the
Judiciary should face such a problem, despite the inertia of the legislator. Thus, as long as
there is no legislative change capable of adjusting the treatment of drugs, users and traffickers
to social reality, it is incumbent upon the director's agent to give interpretative guidelines to
current legislation, in order to highlight the humanitarian bias, focused on autonomy and
individual freedom, respect for diversity, promotion of ethical and cultural values, whose
position will minimize the consequences of repressive policy and contribute to a decrease in
incarceration for trafficking
|
