The Transamazônica is a region of agricultural frontier planned by the military
governments, with a finality to connect The Amazônia to the rest of the country. With the
abandon of the colonization project, the migrants reacted and with the help of Catholic
Church created on important social movement. The discourse of a sustainable development,
diffused by ECO92 to Transamazônica in 1989, with the meeting of Xingu Indian people, in
protest against the construction of Belo Monte Hydroelectric power station.
The focus of this study is the discourse. It treats an historic-social analyze of oral and
writing discourse of agricultors and the Catholic Church, on the development and the
environment, identifying limits and the possibilities, as the provoked changes by its in the
politic social and environmental scenery of the region. It used the method of the analyze of
discourse since the category of interdiscoursevity, denominated bay Fairclough (2001) as the
combination of several elements of order of discourse in a same discourse. The objective of
this category is to specify the types of discourse that they are present in analyzed discourse
sample.
The areas of the study is situated in the west of Pará, more exactly in the localized
municipalities a long of BR – 230, of Uruará until Pacaja, in the BR-163, of Placas until
Itaituba and in the middle Xingu including the municipalities of Vitória do Xingu, Senador
José Porfirio e Porto de Moz. This region is also the priority area of actuation of Prelazia of
Xingu and the leaded social movement by agricultors.
Four subjects were selected to the analyze: the demarcation of the Cachoeira Seca
Indian Land, Especial FNO, the Belo Monte construction and the Proambiente program. The
results chose that the international social environmental influenced the agricultors social
movement of Transamazônica and Xingu. Though, the creation of the resex, parks, well as
debates about the environmental impacts of Belo Monte, a expansion of the soybean and other
initiatives also showed that the diversified familiar agriculture, with access to the public
politics, getting their production benefited and commercialized, it’s the model of aspired
development by these actors. The Proambiente is an example of this.
|
