Resumo Indígena (dc.description.indigena). Fonte: PDF/ Catálogo Teses Capes
This dissertation examines how the actions taken by militants and participants of
Palmares II Project Settlement, in Parauapebas-PA, contribute or not to consolidate a
solidarity political practice in tune with MST ideals, since the camp through settlement
phases. Data were collected between January and August 2010 through structured
questionnaire used to interview leaders and settlers from the settlement into focus. The main
work category is the collective action. It presents evidence that favored the formation and
consolidation of the MST in Brazil, and later in Pará. Discusses the theoretical and empirical
aspects of collective action in the movement, followed by a brief history of the development
of the settlement, demonstrates and describes the collective actions that occurred during this
period, brings into discussion contributions of America in Chicago school and from the Italian
philosopher Antonio Gramsci. Describes collective efforts in the settlement occurred between
1996 and 2010, demonstrates how they developed, what goals and failures that marked this
period, using the Olson, Mckean and Ostrom contributions to substantiate the
discussion. Notes similarities and differences between the settlers projects and leaders of the
movement, showing that some settlers had their projects "failed" due to the impositions of
power play settlers / leadership. Points, in the research year, the collective initiatives that
occurred in the settlement, which are assemblies and occupations, in order to resolve issues
demanded by the necessity of settlement infrastructure and water supply
improvement. Finally it states that it must think about the collective actions inside a project
that aims farmers emancipation from a logic that works rooted in respect, first of all centered
in settlers goals and needs, ie confined not in ideal models (averse to reality), but
substantiated in the democratic conduct that strengthens the priorities settlers choice
possibility. So first of all it should hear the agrarian reform actors, the landless or settlers, and
not only allow the supposed leadership’s interests be taken into consider.
|
