This work is insertedat the functionbetweenLinguisticsandLanguageTeaching-Learning and it intends to investigatehowto setupauthoringat teachingactivitiesof Portuguese Language made by Letters‟s undergraduate students (UFPA). First of all, it was needed understand thetheoretical discussionsabout Portuguese Language Teachers Education (CONTRERAS, 2002; PIMENTA, 2005; MAGALHÃES, 2004; HORIKAWA, 2004), the discourse(TÁPIAS-OLIVEIRA, 2005; EUFRÁSIO, 2007;FAIRCHILD, 2009; 2010 etc.), Language teachingmaterials (MARCUSCHI, 2002; SALZANO, 2004; LEFFA, 2003; CERQUEIRA, 2010),authorship – at field of discourse –(FOUCAULT, 2006a; 2006b; BARTHES, 1984; POSSENTI, 2002; etc.), subjectivity(PÊCHEUX, 2010; BAKHTIN, 1997; AUTHIER-REVUZ, 1990; 2004; and others), and the writing (NASIO, 1993; GERALDI, 1997;RIOLFI, 2003; 2008).This study is insertedat theResearch Project"The challenge of teachingreading and writingin the contextof basic educationof nine years andthe insertion of thelaptopin theBrazilian public school", which hasamong itsobjectivestoreflect onteacher education(Portuguese Language Studies and Education) and its relationshipwith theemerging demandsof everydayBrazilian school. Ithada qualitative approach, withthe collectionof thecorpusin two contexts: (i) the disciplineTechnological ResourcesinTeaching Portuguese(1st half of 2011), asteacher and(ii) the disciplineInternshipin Elementary Education(1st half of 2012), asobserverin classes taughtby other teacher. In those twomoments, there wereregistration anddocumentation ofteachingactivitiesof Portuguese Language made by undergraduate students. Theanalysis wasas follows: overall understandingof the corpusin order todescribe typologically the activities and map thediscursive voicesin them , thenwe stoppedin sevenactivitiesto analyzethe way theyhave managedthe voices, thesubjectivity constitution and finally theevidence of authorshipcontained intheexercises. The results showsome difficultyfor undergraduatestudents to managethevoices of(i) thetheoretical and methodological approachesin the field,(ii) thelinguistic material-discursive object of teachingand(iii) the supposedtargetstudentof the activityso that they originallycanbesoauthorsoftheir exercises, and notmere consumers oftheoriesand teaching materialsready to be appliedin the classroom.
|
