Artigo

Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest

One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: RIBEIRO JÚNIOR, Marco Antônio
Outros Autores: ROSSI, Rogério Vieira, MIRANDA, Cleuton Lima, ÁVILA-PIRES, Teresa Cristina Sauer de
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Publicado em: 2014
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6163
id ir-2011-6163
recordtype dspace
spelling ir-2011-61632019-05-23T11:11:47Z Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest RIBEIRO JÚNIOR, Marco Antônio ROSSI, Rogério Vieira MIRANDA, Cleuton Lima ÁVILA-PIRES, Teresa Cristina Sauer de Herpetofauna Réptil Anfíbio Mamíferos de pequeno porte Caça Armadilhas para animais Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã - PA Pará - Estado Amazônia brasileira Método de amostragem One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each trap. To address this problem, we conducted the first standardized comparison of patterns of species richness, rank-abundance, and community structure of leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals for two trap designs (I and Y format) and three bucket sizes (35, 62, and 100 L) in a Neotropical forest. Results are very similar for the herpetofauna, regardless of the pitfall trap design or size used, while for small mammals values of species richness were higher for 100 L pitfall traps, as compared to the smaller traps. Therefore, the use of 100 L pitfall traps is recommended to sample the terrestrial vertebrate fauna, in multidisciplinary studies. For surveys aiming only the herpetofauna the use of smaller (35 L) traps is acceptable, taking into consideration the cost-benefits obtained by the smaller traps, in comparison to the larger ones. 2014-12-15T16:34:17Z 2014-12-15T16:34:17Z 2011-02 Artigo de Periódico RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marco A et al. Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest. Zoologia (Curitiba, Impr.), Curitiba, v. 28, n. 1, p. 80-91, fev. 2011. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/zool/v28n1/v28n1a12.pdf>. Acesso em: 12 dez. 2014. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702011000100012>. 1984-4670 http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6163 eng Acesso Aberto application/pdf
institution Repositório Institucional - Universidade Federal do Pará
collection RI-UFPA
language eng
topic Herpetofauna
Réptil
Anfíbio
Mamíferos de pequeno porte
Caça
Armadilhas para animais
Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã - PA
Pará - Estado
Amazônia brasileira
Método de amostragem
spellingShingle Herpetofauna
Réptil
Anfíbio
Mamíferos de pequeno porte
Caça
Armadilhas para animais
Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã - PA
Pará - Estado
Amazônia brasileira
Método de amostragem
RIBEIRO JÚNIOR, Marco Antônio
Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest
topic_facet Herpetofauna
Réptil
Anfíbio
Mamíferos de pequeno porte
Caça
Armadilhas para animais
Floresta Nacional de Caxiuanã - PA
Pará - Estado
Amazônia brasileira
Método de amostragem
description One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each trap. To address this problem, we conducted the first standardized comparison of patterns of species richness, rank-abundance, and community structure of leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals for two trap designs (I and Y format) and three bucket sizes (35, 62, and 100 L) in a Neotropical forest. Results are very similar for the herpetofauna, regardless of the pitfall trap design or size used, while for small mammals values of species richness were higher for 100 L pitfall traps, as compared to the smaller traps. Therefore, the use of 100 L pitfall traps is recommended to sample the terrestrial vertebrate fauna, in multidisciplinary studies. For surveys aiming only the herpetofauna the use of smaller (35 L) traps is acceptable, taking into consideration the cost-benefits obtained by the smaller traps, in comparison to the larger ones.
format Artigo
author RIBEIRO JÚNIOR, Marco Antônio
author2 ROSSI, Rogério Vieira
MIRANDA, Cleuton Lima
ÁVILA-PIRES, Teresa Cristina Sauer de
author2Str ROSSI, Rogério Vieira
MIRANDA, Cleuton Lima
ÁVILA-PIRES, Teresa Cristina Sauer de
title Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest
title_short Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest
title_full Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest
title_fullStr Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest
title_full_unstemmed Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest
title_sort influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a neotropical forest
publishDate 2014
url http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6163
_version_ 1832602658483994624
score 11.755432