Artigo

Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lipid profiles and coronary heart disease risks of 2 Brazilian Amazonian populations as follows: a riverside population (village of Vigia) and an urban population (city of Belém in the state of Pará). METHODS: Fifty individuals controlled for age and sex were assessed in...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: FEIO, Claudine Maria Alves
Outros Autores: FONSECA, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein, RÊGO, Simone Soares, FEIO, Max Nazareno Barra, ELIAS, Maria Cristina, COSTA, Eduardo Augusto da Silva, IZAR, Maria Cristina de Oliveira, PAOLA, Ângelo Amato Vincenzo de, CARVALHO, Antônio Carlos de Camargo
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Publicado em: 2015
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6552
id ir-2011-6552
recordtype dspace
spelling ir-2011-65522019-05-23T13:25:44Z Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations Perfil lipídico e risco cardiovascular em amazônidas FEIO, Claudine Maria Alves FONSECA, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein RÊGO, Simone Soares FEIO, Max Nazareno Barra ELIAS, Maria Cristina COSTA, Eduardo Augusto da Silva IZAR, Maria Cristina de Oliveira PAOLA, Ângelo Amato Vincenzo de CARVALHO, Antônio Carlos de Camargo Nutrição Lipídeos Fatores de risco Prevenção e controle Ribeirinhos Belém - PA Vigia de Nazaré - PA Pará - Estado Amazônia brasileira OBJECTIVE: To compare the lipid profiles and coronary heart disease risks of 2 Brazilian Amazonian populations as follows: a riverside population (village of Vigia) and an urban population (city of Belém in the state of Pará). METHODS: Fifty individuals controlled for age and sex were assessed in each region, and the major risk factors for coronary heart disease were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP III) and using the Framingham score, both populations had the same absolute risk of events (Vigia = 5.4 ± 1 vs Belém = 5.7 ± 1), although the population of Vigia had a lower consumption of saturated fat (P<0.0001), a greater consumption of mono- and polyunsaturated fat (P<0.03), in addition to lower values for body mass index (25.4± 0.6 vs 27.6 ± 0.7 kg/m², P<0.02), of biceps skin fold (18.6 ± 1.1 vs 27.5 ± 1.3 mm, P<0.0001), of triceps skin fold (28.7 ± 1.2 vs 37.3 ± 1.7 mm, P<0.002), and of total cholesterol (205 ± 5 vs 223 ± 6 mg/dL, P< 0.03) and triglycerides (119 ± 9 vs 177 ± 18 mg/dL, P<0.005). Both populations did not differ in regard to HDL-C (46 ± 1 vs 46 ± 1 mg/dL), LDL-C (135 ± 4 vs 144 ± 5 mg/dL) and blood pressure (SBP 124 ± 3 vs 128 ± 3 mmHg; DBP 80 ± 2 vs 82 ± 2 mmHg). CONCLUSION: The riverside and urban populations of Amazonia had similar cardiovascular risks. However, the marked difference in the variables studied suggests that different strategies of prevention should be applied. OBJETIVO: Comparar o perfil lipídico e risco coronariano de uma população ribeirinha (Vigia) ao de uma população urbana (Belém). MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 50 indivíduos de cada região, controlados por idade e sexo, examinando-se os principais fatores de risco para a doença coronariana. RESULTADOS: Segundo o Programa Nacional de Educação sobre o Colesterol (NCEP III) e determinando-se o escore de Framingham, ambas as populações expressaram o mesmo risco absoluto de eventos (Vigia 5,4 ± 1 vs. Belém 5,7 ± 1), a despeito da população de Vigia apresentar menor consumo de gordura saturada (p<0,0001), maior de mono e poliinsaturada (p<0,03), além de menores valores do índice de massa corpórea (25,4±0,6 vs. 27,6±0,7kg/m², p<0,02), da prega biceptal (18,6±1,1 vs. 27,5±1,3mm, p<0,0001) e triceptal (28,7±1,2 vs. 37,3±1,7mm, p<0,002), de colesterol total (205±5 vs. 223±6mg/dL, p< 0,03) e triglicérides (119 ± 9 vs. 177±18mg/dL, p<0,005), não diferindo no HDL-c (46±1 vs. 46±1mg/dL), LDL-c (135 ± 4 vs. 144 ± 5mg/dL) e pressão arterial (PAS 124 ± 3 vs. 128 ± 3mmHg; PAD 80 ± 2 vs. 82 ± 2mmHg). CONCLUSÃO: A população ribeirinha e urbana da Amazônia apresentaram risco cardiovascular semelhante. Entretanto, a marcante diferença entre as variáveis estudadas sugere que devam ser aplicadas diferentes estratégias de prevenção. 2015-04-17T16:21:59Z 2015-04-17T16:21:59Z 2003-12 Artigo de Periódico FEIO, Claudine Maria Alves et al. Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, São Paulo, v. 81, n. 6, p. 596-599, dez. 2003. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abc/v81n6/18386.pdf>; <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/abc/v81n6/pt_18386.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 abr. 2015. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0066-782X2003001400006>. 0066-782X http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6552 eng Acesso Aberto application/pdf application/pdf
institution Repositório Institucional - Universidade Federal do Pará
collection RI-UFPA
language eng
topic Nutrição
Lipídeos
Fatores de risco
Prevenção e controle
Ribeirinhos
Belém - PA
Vigia de Nazaré - PA
Pará - Estado
Amazônia brasileira
spellingShingle Nutrição
Lipídeos
Fatores de risco
Prevenção e controle
Ribeirinhos
Belém - PA
Vigia de Nazaré - PA
Pará - Estado
Amazônia brasileira
FEIO, Claudine Maria Alves
Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations
topic_facet Nutrição
Lipídeos
Fatores de risco
Prevenção e controle
Ribeirinhos
Belém - PA
Vigia de Nazaré - PA
Pará - Estado
Amazônia brasileira
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the lipid profiles and coronary heart disease risks of 2 Brazilian Amazonian populations as follows: a riverside population (village of Vigia) and an urban population (city of Belém in the state of Pará). METHODS: Fifty individuals controlled for age and sex were assessed in each region, and the major risk factors for coronary heart disease were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP III) and using the Framingham score, both populations had the same absolute risk of events (Vigia = 5.4 ± 1 vs Belém = 5.7 ± 1), although the population of Vigia had a lower consumption of saturated fat (P<0.0001), a greater consumption of mono- and polyunsaturated fat (P<0.03), in addition to lower values for body mass index (25.4± 0.6 vs 27.6 ± 0.7 kg/m², P<0.02), of biceps skin fold (18.6 ± 1.1 vs 27.5 ± 1.3 mm, P<0.0001), of triceps skin fold (28.7 ± 1.2 vs 37.3 ± 1.7 mm, P<0.002), and of total cholesterol (205 ± 5 vs 223 ± 6 mg/dL, P< 0.03) and triglycerides (119 ± 9 vs 177 ± 18 mg/dL, P<0.005). Both populations did not differ in regard to HDL-C (46 ± 1 vs 46 ± 1 mg/dL), LDL-C (135 ± 4 vs 144 ± 5 mg/dL) and blood pressure (SBP 124 ± 3 vs 128 ± 3 mmHg; DBP 80 ± 2 vs 82 ± 2 mmHg). CONCLUSION: The riverside and urban populations of Amazonia had similar cardiovascular risks. However, the marked difference in the variables studied suggests that different strategies of prevention should be applied.
format Artigo
author FEIO, Claudine Maria Alves
author2 FONSECA, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein
RÊGO, Simone Soares
FEIO, Max Nazareno Barra
ELIAS, Maria Cristina
COSTA, Eduardo Augusto da Silva
IZAR, Maria Cristina de Oliveira
PAOLA, Ângelo Amato Vincenzo de
CARVALHO, Antônio Carlos de Camargo
author2Str FONSECA, Francisco Antonio Helfenstein
RÊGO, Simone Soares
FEIO, Max Nazareno Barra
ELIAS, Maria Cristina
COSTA, Eduardo Augusto da Silva
IZAR, Maria Cristina de Oliveira
PAOLA, Ângelo Amato Vincenzo de
CARVALHO, Antônio Carlos de Camargo
title Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations
title_short Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations
title_full Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations
title_fullStr Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations
title_full_unstemmed Lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two Amazonian populations
title_sort lipid profile and cardiovascular risk in two amazonian populations
publishDate 2015
url http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6552
_version_ 1832603098086899712
score 11.755432