This dissertation aims to analyze how the judges work with respect evaluates evidence in the civil suit, precisely in regard to judicial conviction, and how this convictions are exposed in decisions motivation. In this way, preliminarily studied a bit about the institute of proof, and then arrive in a discussion about the change of paradigm caused by the influence of Fundamental Rights emanating from Federal Constitution 1988 in the Brasilian law, and so explain about the existents evaluates models of the proofs, and their ability to eliminate judicial discretion, forward the current complexity of the demands put on trial. Started to look for assistance in compared doctrine for institutes that can be transported to the usual national practice, and complement argumentation, and necessary motivation motivates so that the correct standard of proof could give rise to a conviction court properly motivated, which makes the ideal democratic state.
|
