This research is part of the training of teachers of Mathematics. The overall objective is to understand aspects in which the process of building didactic sequence, in light of the Mathematics Education, was established as a mechanism for training teachers of mathematics in the perspective of show formative characteristics related with the development of base for the knowledge of teaching staff and reflective teacher. The theoretical anchors related to Mathematics Education and Teacher Training that sustain this research, is based in Lorenzato & Fiorentini (2009), Mendes (2009), Lorenzato (2009), Zabala (1998), Schön (1983, 1992, 2000), Shulman (1986, 1987) Brazil (1996, 1998, 1999). The methodological referral defined based on an approach, emphasizing the process that allowed the construction of activities for teachers in training. The central methodological argument is sustained by the possibility of generate subsides to discuss the processes of teacher training bearing in account the possibilities of articulations between theory and practice in the process of building didactic sequence can promote. The locus of the research was given during the discipline Methodological Trends in Mathematics Education which was attended by students and teachers of Specialization Course in Mathematics Education (lato sensu) of the Institute of Mathematics and Science Education, Federal University of Pará. The empirical material was collected through interpretations of the actions that were manifested in: (a) questionnaires, (b) transcription videographic records of the construction of the didactic sequence, (c) reports of days and (d) final report. The analyzes were organized in six times in which these reveals the path traced by the research subjects. Results show that the process of constructing didactic sequence (CSDP) constitutes as a mechanism for the formation of the mathematics teacher in the following aspects: promotes (1) Mathematics Education, (2) the reflective teacher, (3) methodological tendencies in mathematics education, (4) articulation with the PCN and the LDB, (5) the articulation between Theory and Practice, (6) the teacher researcher, (7) the general pedagogical knowledge, (8) the specific knowledge of the content, (9) the pedagogical content knowledge, (10) propositional knowledge, (11) needs a practical moment, (12) needs the presence and interference of Mathematical Educator (by promoting reflection).
|
