The present text had the objective of analyzing the determinations that prioritize the public financing to the private institutions in the offers of professional education, through Pronatec in the Amazon Pará. The initial proposal of the research project that materialized this thesis sought to answer the following prolema question: - How is explained the preference of the Brazilian government to invest primarily in private institutions to the detriment of public ones in the offer of Professional Education through Pronatec in the Amazon Paraense ? The central debate seeks to unveil the National Program of Access to Technical Education and Employment (Pronatec), which is our object of study. The discussion looks for elements in the historical context, highlighting the characteristics, limits and fragilities of professional education programs (PIPIMO, PLANFOR, PNQ, PBP and Pronatec). It points out the historical prioritization for the public financing of private offers of professional education. In this sense, it seeks to deconstruct the debate about the quality of education announced, but not materialized by the government, which uses the Program as an ideological tool, what we call the chameleon posture of Brazilian public policies. The study highlights in five chapters the characteristics of professional education, marked by history, class dispute and control of the ruling class under the poor class, ideologically justified by measures of "inclusion", called by them of opportunities. To this end, the text makes a permanent debate in the light of Marxist and Marxist readings on educational policies, the public-private relationship, through the legal framework and the program executions mentioned above. We used document analysis from the S System reports (SENAI / DN, SENAC / PA and SENAC / PA with the executions from 2012 to 2014), SETEC (2013, 2014 and 2015) and SEDUC / PA (2012, 2014 and 2016), in addition to the legislation in force, which helped us to establish the legal framework, as well as the debate articulated with the theoretical-methodological framework. The methodology focused on the Marxist approach, especially in the debates about the dialectical conception, contradiction, totality and the relation between appearance and essence. Among the main authors who assisted us in this reflection are Marx (2008), Lefebvre (2009), Frigotto (1996). In the debate on the public-private relationship Santos (2008, 2013, 2014), Adrião and Peroni (2012); And in relation to professional education Araújo e Silva (2007), Manfredi (2002), Frigotto (2010), Ciavatta and Ramos (2005) and Melo and Moura (2016). The methodological procedures used were bibliographic research, documentary analysis and field research, with the locals as Secretaries of Education of Pará and the National Service of Commercial Learning, regional department of Pará (SENAC / PA). In the data collection we performed the semi-structured interview with the Pronatec Managers in the two institutions, in addition to the SENAC / PA teachers. The research indicates that the Program assumes a market position and does not promote the quality of professional education, since it favors the synthetic formation through the courses of Initial and Continuing Education, which constitutes the strategy of capital in social control through "Formations", discontinuous and alienating.
|
