Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica
Ceramics, especially in the Amazon region, is considered a very important tool for the knowledge of ancient indigenous societies, in order to reveal a little about the lives of our ancestors. In this sense, the study of archeological remains and their restoration is fundamental for the historical re...
| Autor principal: | Silva, Antônio Marcelo Vieira |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | Magalhães, Marcos Pereira |
| Grau: | Resumo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Publicado em: |
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
2023
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: |
https://repositorio.museu-goeldi.br/handle/mgoeldi/1932 |
| id |
ir-mgoeldi-1932 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
ir-mgoeldi-19322023-03-08T06:01:10Z Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica Carajás Archeological Project: graphic reconstitution of ceramics sub-project Silva, Antônio Marcelo Vieira Magalhães, Marcos Pereira Cerâmica Utensílios CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ARQUEOLOGIA Ceramics, especially in the Amazon region, is considered a very important tool for the knowledge of ancient indigenous societies, in order to reveal a little about the lives of our ancestors. In this sense, the study of archeological remains and their restoration is fundamental for the historical recovery of these peoples, besides providing us with data that help us in the analysis process of comparative studies. The objective of this work was to graphically reconstruct the ceramics found in the Pequiá cave and to analyze body, base, and rim fragments in the laboratory. For the fragments the microscope of the laboratory was used, while the ceramic shapes were reconstituted in CorelDraw. Of the 18 pieces worked, all were graphically reconstructed. As for the ceramic analysis it was recorded that: on the rim 50% of the fragments were made of crushed rock, of these 93% were undecorated and the rest were decorated. Of the 50% of sand only 2% were decorated. In the analysis of the base it was observed that 62% contained crushed rock, and of these 90% were undecorated versus 10% decorated. For the sand it was also found that 90% were undecorated versus 10% decorated. In the analysis of the body 53% were of crushed rock, with 95% of the fragments being undecorated and only 5% decorated. In this sense, the remaining 47% of sand had 91% undecorated against 9% decorated. Therefore, we can evaluate that the decoration became more present in the pieces that had crushed rock in their seasoning, because this presents a smoother surface. While the pieces made with sand, which have a rougher surface, decoration was not common. This may be due to the fact that the sand pieces were more used for pots, pans and other utensils. A cerâmica, principalmente na região amazônica, se denomina como uma importantíssima ferramenta para o conhecimento das sociedade indígenas antigas, no intuito de nos revelar um pouco sobre a vida dos nossos antepassados. Neste sentido, o estudo dos restos arqueológicos e sua restauração é fundamental para a recuperação histórica destes povos, além de nos fornecer dados que nos auxilie no processo de análise de estudos comparativos. O trabalho desenvolvido teve como objetivo reconstituir graficamente a cerâmica encontrada na gruta do Pequiá e analisar fragmentos de corpo, base e borda em laboratório. Para os fragmentos se utilizou o microscópio do laboratório enquanto que as formas cerâmicas foram reconstituídas no CorelDraw. Das 18 peças trabalhadas, todas foram graficamente reconstituídas. Quanto à análise cerâmica registrou-se que: na borda, 50% dos fragmentos eram feitos de rocha triturada, sendo que destes 93% não eram decorados e o restante eram decorados. Dos 50% de areia apenas 2% eram decorados. Na análise da base observou-se que 62% continham rocha triturada, sendo que destes 90% não eram decorados contra 10% de decorados. Para a areia também verificou-se que 90% constituíam-se de não decorados contra 10% de decorados. Na análise do corpo 53% eram de rocha triturada, com 95% dos fragmentos sem decoração e apenas 5% decorados, neste sentido os 47% restantes de areia possuíam 91 % não decorados contra 9% de decorados. Portanto, podemos avaliar que a decoração se tomou mais presente nas peças que possuíam rocha triturada no seu tempero, pois essa apresenta uma superfície mais lisa. Enquanto que as peças fabricadas com areia, que possuem uma superfície mais rugosa, não era comum a decoração. Isso talvez se dê pelo fato de que as de areia fossem mais utilizada para a utilização de potes, panelas e outros utensílios. 2023-03-07T19:14:26Z 2023-03-07 2023-03-07T19:14:26Z 2000-07-06 Resumo SILVA, Antônio Marcelo Vieira; MAGALHÃES, Marcos Pereira. Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica. In: SEMINÁRIO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DO MUSEU GOELDI, 8., 2000, Belém. Livro de resumos. Belém: MPEG, 2000. https://repositorio.museu-goeldi.br/handle/mgoeldi/1932 por Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica Acesso Aberto application/pdf Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi Brasil MPEG |
| institution |
Repositório Institucional - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi |
| collection |
RepositorioEmilioGoeldi |
| language |
por |
| topic |
Cerâmica Utensílios CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ARQUEOLOGIA |
| spellingShingle |
Cerâmica Utensílios CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ARQUEOLOGIA Silva, Antônio Marcelo Vieira Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| topic_facet |
Cerâmica Utensílios CNPQ::CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ARQUEOLOGIA |
| description |
Ceramics, especially in the Amazon region, is considered a very important tool for the knowledge of ancient indigenous societies, in order to reveal a little about the lives of our ancestors. In this sense, the study of archeological remains and their restoration is fundamental for the historical recovery of these peoples, besides providing us with data that help us in the analysis process of comparative studies. The objective of this work was to graphically reconstruct the ceramics found in the Pequiá cave and to analyze body, base, and rim fragments in the laboratory. For the fragments the microscope of the laboratory was used, while the ceramic shapes were reconstituted in CorelDraw. Of the 18 pieces worked, all were graphically reconstructed. As for the ceramic analysis it was recorded that: on the rim 50% of the fragments were made of crushed rock, of these 93% were undecorated and the rest were decorated. Of the 50% of sand only 2% were decorated. In the analysis of the base it was observed that 62% contained crushed rock, and of these 90% were undecorated versus 10% decorated. For the sand it was also found that 90% were undecorated versus 10% decorated. In the analysis of the body 53% were of crushed rock, with 95% of the fragments being undecorated and only 5% decorated. In this sense, the remaining 47% of sand had 91% undecorated against 9% decorated. Therefore, we can evaluate that the decoration became more present in the pieces that had crushed rock in their seasoning, because this presents a smoother surface. While the pieces made with sand, which have a rougher surface, decoration was not common. This may be due to the fact that the sand pieces were more used for pots, pans and other utensils. |
| format |
Resumo |
| author |
Silva, Antônio Marcelo Vieira |
| author2 |
Magalhães, Marcos Pereira |
| author2Str |
Magalhães, Marcos Pereira |
| title |
Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| title_short |
Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| title_full |
Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| title_fullStr |
Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Projeto arqueológico Carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| title_sort |
projeto arqueológico carajás: sub-projeto de reconstituição gráfica da cerâmica |
| publisher |
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi |
| publishDate |
2023 |
| url |
https://repositorio.museu-goeldi.br/handle/mgoeldi/1932 |
| _version_ |
1787135926490628096 |
| score |
11.653393 |