Artigo

Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.

One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Ribeiro-Junior, Marco Antônio
Outros Autores: Rossi, Rogério Vieira, Miranda, Cleuton Lima, Ávila-Pires, Teresa Cristina Sauer de
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia 2011
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: http://repositorio.museu-goeldi.br/handle/mgoeldi/436
id ir-mgoeldi-436
recordtype dspace
spelling ir-mgoeldi-4362019-07-17T17:55:43Z Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest. Ribeiro-Junior, Marco Antônio Rossi, Rogério Vieira Miranda, Cleuton Lima Ávila-Pires, Teresa Cristina Sauer de Anfíbios Floresta tropical Répteis Mamíferos Amphibians Faunal survey Neotropical forest Repitiles Sampling method One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each trap. To address this problem, we conducted the first standardized comparison of patterns of species richness, rank-abundance, and community structure of leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals for two trap designs (I and Y format) and three bucket sizes (35, 62, and 100 L) in a Neotropical forest. Results are very similar for the herpetofauna, regardless of the pitfall trap design or size used, while for small mammals values of species richness were higher for 100 L pitfall traps, as compared to the smaller traps. Therefore, the use of 100 L pitfall traps is recommended to sample the terrestrial vertebrate fauna, in multidisciplinary studies. For surveys aiming only the herpetofauna the use of smaller (35 L) traps is acceptable, taking into consideration the cost-benefits obtained by the smaller traps, in comparison to the larger ones. 2011-05-23T12:03:19Z 2011-05-23T12:03:19Z 2011-02 artigo RIBEIRO-JUNIOR, Marco A et al . Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest. Zoologia (Curitiba, Impr.), Curitiba, v. 28, n. 1, fev. 2011 . Disponível em <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1984-46702011000100012&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. acessos em 23 maio 2011. doi: 10.1590/S1984-46702011000100012. 1984-4670 http://repositorio.museu-goeldi.br/handle/mgoeldi/436 en application/pdf Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
institution Repositório Institucional - Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi
collection RepositorioEmilioGoeldi
language English
topic Anfíbios
Floresta tropical
Répteis
Mamíferos
Amphibians
Faunal survey
Neotropical forest
Repitiles
Sampling method
spellingShingle Anfíbios
Floresta tropical
Répteis
Mamíferos
Amphibians
Faunal survey
Neotropical forest
Repitiles
Sampling method
Ribeiro-Junior, Marco Antônio
Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.
topic_facet Anfíbios
Floresta tropical
Répteis
Mamíferos
Amphibians
Faunal survey
Neotropical forest
Repitiles
Sampling method
description One of the most commonly used sampling techniques to capture leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals is a set of pitfall traps with drift fences. However, there are still many speculations concerning the effectiveness of different designs of pitfall traps and the most adequate size of each trap. To address this problem, we conducted the first standardized comparison of patterns of species richness, rank-abundance, and community structure of leaf litter amphibians, lizards and small mammals for two trap designs (I and Y format) and three bucket sizes (35, 62, and 100 L) in a Neotropical forest. Results are very similar for the herpetofauna, regardless of the pitfall trap design or size used, while for small mammals values of species richness were higher for 100 L pitfall traps, as compared to the smaller traps. Therefore, the use of 100 L pitfall traps is recommended to sample the terrestrial vertebrate fauna, in multidisciplinary studies. For surveys aiming only the herpetofauna the use of smaller (35 L) traps is acceptable, taking into consideration the cost-benefits obtained by the smaller traps, in comparison to the larger ones.
format Artigo
author Ribeiro-Junior, Marco Antônio
author2 Rossi, Rogério Vieira
Miranda, Cleuton Lima
Ávila-Pires, Teresa Cristina Sauer de
author2Str Rossi, Rogério Vieira
Miranda, Cleuton Lima
Ávila-Pires, Teresa Cristina Sauer de
title Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.
title_short Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.
title_full Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.
title_fullStr Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.
title_full_unstemmed Influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a Neotropical Forest.
title_sort influence of pitfall trap size and design on herpetofauna and small mammal studies in a neotropical forest.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Zoologia
publishDate 2011
url http://repositorio.museu-goeldi.br/handle/mgoeldi/436
_version_ 1787135848473427968
score 11.755432