Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Graduação

Inversão gravimétrica linear do relevo do embasamento de bacias sedimentares

The gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins is of utmost importance in hydrocarbon prospecting. The increasing demand of detailed interpretations using a huge number of observations and parameters to be estimated has compelled the development of efficient gravity inversion methods applied to...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: ARAÚJO, Ana Carolina Melo de
Grau: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Graduação
Publicado em: 2019
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: http://bdm.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/prefix/1733
Resumo:
The gravity interpretation of sedimentary basins is of utmost importance in hydrocarbon prospecting. The increasing demand of detailed interpretations using a huge number of observations and parameters to be estimated has compelled the development of efficient gravity inversion methods applied to this sort of geological environment. We present a new gravity inversion method applicable to the estimation of the basement relief of a sedimentary basin based on the linear approximation between the gravity anomaly and the thickness of the horizontal ribbon model. The observations are modeled by a set of juxtaposed horizontal ribbons, whose thicknesses are the parameters to be estimated. Each observation is modeled by a set of ribbons located at a given depth. The observations displaying smaller amplitude in absolute value are associated with shallower sets of ribbons. This procedure enhances the estimates of very deep basement features, which usually is not possible using the available methods based on linear approximations. The estimates, stabilized by the first-order Tikhonov stabilizing functional, retrieve the basement relief shape, but in a different scale from the true relief. The knowledge of the basement depth at a single point of the basement is then used to bring the estimated relief to the correct scale. The proposed method has been tested on synthetic and real gravity data, and produced always similar results as compared with the more precise nonlinear method. The proposed method, however, required less computational time. The difference between the required computer times increases with the number of observations and parameters.