The choice of paving material is essential in urban projects, influencing durability, cost,
aesthetics and environmental impact. At Condomínio Quintas de São José do Rio
Negro, in Manaus, local weather conditions, such as intense rain and high
temperatures, made this decision even more relevant. A comparative analysis between
interlocking paver and asphalt revealed advantages and advantages of both materials.
The interlocking paver stood out for its appearance, aesthetic appeal, high resistance
and ability to move through the block joints, reducing the impact of rain on the drainage
system. Asphalt showed greater capacity for intense traffic but presented higher
maintenance costs and lower environmental sustainability. In tropical regions,
interlocking pavement performed better against rain and heat, while asphalt suffered
greater wear, increasing costs and damaging its useful life. From an environmental
point of view, the paver contributed to recharging groundwater and minimizing flooding,
while asphalt, derived from petroleum, generated a greater environmental impact.
Economically, although paving has a higher initial cost, its durability and lower
maintenance requirements make it more advantageous in the long term. Asphalt,
despite being more accessible initially, required occasional interventions, increasing
costs over time. It is concluded that the interlocking paver is the ideal solution to meet
the needs of the condominium, offering a balance between technical, economic and
environmental aspects.
|
