/img alt="Imagem da capa" class="recordcover" src="""/>
Artigo
Classificação do nível de rugosidade usando sensor inercial para robôs terrestres em ambientes externos
Ground robots operating in outdoor environments often face rough and uneven terrains, which can significantly challenge their navigation capabilities. This paper proposes an approach for classifying roughness levels of outdoor terrains using inertial sensors for ground robots. This paper proposes an...
Autor principal: | Oliveira, Juan Miguel de Assis |
---|---|
Grau: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Publicado em: |
Brasil
2023
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: |
http://riu.ufam.edu.br/handle/prefix/7005 |
Resumo: |
---|
Ground robots operating in outdoor environments often face rough and uneven terrains, which can significantly challenge their navigation capabilities. This paper proposes an approach for classifying roughness levels of outdoor terrains using inertial sensors for ground robots. This paper proposes an investigation concerning inertial sensors for roughness level classification of ground robots during their navigation in outdoor environments. For this, a Deep Learning based approach is proposed to classify the level of irregular terrains. Our methodology consists of two main steps: (i) inertial measures representation; and (ii) roughness level classification. First, inertial measures from a sliding window are acquired and depicted as a bi-dimensional representation. After, the vibration features are learned by a Convolutional Neural Network and classified into different roughness levels.Additionally, the impact of different terrain and robot conditions is assessed to comprehend its effect during terrain analysis. Simulated and real-world experiments were carried out to validate the proposed approach, achieving accurate and reliable results, even in different surface circumstances.The proposed approach achieved accuracy over 96% in simulated experiments regarding different surface heights, distances and shapes. In addition, achieved accuracy over 88% in real experiments. |