Artigo

Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats

Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification rem...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Rocha, Ricardo
Outros Autores: Ferreira, Diogo F., López-Baucells, Adrià, Farneda, Fábio Z., Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito, Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel, Meyer, Christoph F.J.
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: Biotropica 2020
Assuntos:
Bat
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031
id oai:repositorio:1-13031
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-13031 Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats Rocha, Ricardo Ferreira, Diogo F. López-Baucells, Adrià Farneda, Fábio Z. Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel Meyer, Christoph F.J. Abundance Bat Behavioral Response Bioenergetics Conservation Planning Edge Effect Habitat Fragmentation Habitat Use Intraspecific Variation Matrix Neotropical Region Seasonality Secondary Forest Sex Ratio Sex-related Difference Spatial Analysis Amazon River Carollia Perspicillata Rhinophylla Pumilio Vertebrata Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation. 2020-04-21T17:03:14Z 2020-04-21T17:03:14Z 2017 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031 10.1111/btp.12474 en Volume 49, Número 6, Pags. 881-890 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ application/pdf Biotropica
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Abundance
Bat
Behavioral Response
Bioenergetics
Conservation Planning
Edge Effect
Habitat Fragmentation
Habitat Use
Intraspecific Variation
Matrix
Neotropical Region
Seasonality
Secondary Forest
Sex Ratio
Sex-related Difference
Spatial Analysis
Amazon River
Carollia Perspicillata
Rhinophylla Pumilio
Vertebrata
spellingShingle Abundance
Bat
Behavioral Response
Bioenergetics
Conservation Planning
Edge Effect
Habitat Fragmentation
Habitat Use
Intraspecific Variation
Matrix
Neotropical Region
Seasonality
Secondary Forest
Sex Ratio
Sex-related Difference
Spatial Analysis
Amazon River
Carollia Perspicillata
Rhinophylla Pumilio
Vertebrata
Rocha, Ricardo
Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
topic_facet Abundance
Bat
Behavioral Response
Bioenergetics
Conservation Planning
Edge Effect
Habitat Fragmentation
Habitat Use
Intraspecific Variation
Matrix
Neotropical Region
Seasonality
Secondary Forest
Sex Ratio
Sex-related Difference
Spatial Analysis
Amazon River
Carollia Perspicillata
Rhinophylla Pumilio
Vertebrata
description Understanding the consequences of habitat modification on wildlife communities is central to the development of conservation strategies. However, albeit male and female individuals of numerous species are known to exhibit differences in habitat use, sex-specific responses to habitat modification remain little explored. Here, we used a landscape-scale fragmentation experiment to assess, separately for males and females, the effects of fragmentation on the abundance of Carollia perspicillata and Rhinophylla pumilio, two widespread Neotropical frugivorous bats. We predicted that sex-specific responses would arise from higher energetic requirements from pregnancy and lactation in females. Analyses were conducted independently for each season, and we further investigated the joint responses to local and landscape-scale metrics of habitat quality, composition, and configuration. Although males and females responded similarly to a fragmentation gradient composed by continuous forest, fragment interiors, edges, and matrix habitats, we found marked differences between sexes in habitat use for at least one of the seasons. Whereas the sex ratio varied little in continuous forest and fragment interiors, females were found to be more abundant than males in edge and matrix habitats. This difference was more prominent in the dry season, the reproductive season of both species. For both species, abundance responses to local- and landscape-scale predictors differed between sexes and again, differences were more pronounced in the dry season. The results suggest considerable sex-mediated responses to forest disruption and degradation in tropical bats and complement our understanding of the impacts of fragmentation on tropical forest vertebrate communities. © 2017 The Authors. Biotropica published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Association for Tropical Biology and Conservation.
format Artigo
author Rocha, Ricardo
author2 Ferreira, Diogo F.
López-Baucells, Adrià
Farneda, Fábio Z.
Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito
Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel
Meyer, Christoph F.J.
author2Str Ferreira, Diogo F.
López-Baucells, Adrià
Farneda, Fábio Z.
Carreiras, João Manuel de Brito
Palmeirim, Jorge Manuel
Meyer, Christoph F.J.
title Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_short Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_full Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_fullStr Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_full_unstemmed Does sex matter? Gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in Neotropical bats
title_sort does sex matter? gender-specific responses to forest fragmentation in neotropical bats
publisher Biotropica
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/13031
_version_ 1787145403175534592
score 11.674752