Artigo

Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia

Background: Native Amazonian populations managed forest resources in numerous ways, often creating oligarchic forests dominated by useful trees. The scale and spatial distribution of forest modification beyond pre-Columbian settlements is still unknown, although recent studies propose that human imp...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Levis, Carolina
Outros Autores: Souza, Priscila Figueira de, Schietti, Juliana, Emilio, Thaise, Pinto, José Luiz Purri da Veiga, Clement, Charles Roland, Costa, Flávia Regina Capellotto
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: PLoS ONE 2020
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14723
id oai:repositorio:1-14723
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-14723 Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia Levis, Carolina Souza, Priscila Figueira de Schietti, Juliana Emilio, Thaise Pinto, José Luiz Purri da Veiga Clement, Charles Roland Costa, Flávia Regina Capellotto Charcoal Agriculture Antiquity Arboreal Species Archeology Arecaceae Biomanipulation Domestication Environmental Sustainability Forest Geographic Distribution History Landscape Modern Times Nonhuman Plant Community Population Abundance Quantitative Analysis River Soil Analysis Species Composition Species Richness Tree Brasil Charcoal Geography Human Activities Humans Regression Analysis Rivers Soil Trees Background: Native Amazonian populations managed forest resources in numerous ways, often creating oligarchic forests dominated by useful trees. The scale and spatial distribution of forest modification beyond pre-Columbian settlements is still unknown, although recent studies propose that human impact away from rivers was minimal. We tested the hypothesis that past human management of the useful tree community decreases with distance from rivers. Methodology/Principal Findings: In six sites, we inventoried trees and palms with DBH≥10 cm and collected soil for charcoal analysis; we also mapped archaeological evidence around the sites. To quantify forest manipulation, we measured the relative abundance, richness and basal area of useful trees and palms. We found a strong negative exponential relationship between forest manipulation and distance to large rivers. Plots located from 10 to 20 km from a main river had 20-40% useful arboreal species, plots between 20 and 40 km had 12-23%, plots more than 40 km had less than 15%. Soil charcoal abundance was high in the two sites closest to secondary rivers, suggesting past agricultural practices. The shortest distance between archaeological evidence and plots was found in sites near rivers. Conclusions/Significance: These results strongly suggest that past forest manipulation was not limited to the pre-Columbian settlements along major rivers, but extended over interfluvial areas considered to be primary forest today. The sustainable use of Amazonian forests will be most effective if it considers the degree of past landscape domestication, as human-modified landscapes concentrate useful plants for human sustainable use and management today. © 2012 Levis et al. 2020-04-24T17:00:55Z 2020-04-24T17:00:55Z 2012 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14723 10.1371/journal.pone.0048559 en Volume 7, Número 11 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/ application/pdf PLoS ONE
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Charcoal
Agriculture
Antiquity
Arboreal Species
Archeology
Arecaceae
Biomanipulation
Domestication
Environmental Sustainability
Forest
Geographic Distribution
History
Landscape
Modern Times
Nonhuman
Plant Community
Population Abundance
Quantitative Analysis
River
Soil Analysis
Species Composition
Species Richness
Tree
Brasil
Charcoal
Geography
Human Activities
Humans
Regression Analysis
Rivers
Soil
Trees
spellingShingle Charcoal
Agriculture
Antiquity
Arboreal Species
Archeology
Arecaceae
Biomanipulation
Domestication
Environmental Sustainability
Forest
Geographic Distribution
History
Landscape
Modern Times
Nonhuman
Plant Community
Population Abundance
Quantitative Analysis
River
Soil Analysis
Species Composition
Species Richness
Tree
Brasil
Charcoal
Geography
Human Activities
Humans
Regression Analysis
Rivers
Soil
Trees
Levis, Carolina
Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia
topic_facet Charcoal
Agriculture
Antiquity
Arboreal Species
Archeology
Arecaceae
Biomanipulation
Domestication
Environmental Sustainability
Forest
Geographic Distribution
History
Landscape
Modern Times
Nonhuman
Plant Community
Population Abundance
Quantitative Analysis
River
Soil Analysis
Species Composition
Species Richness
Tree
Brasil
Charcoal
Geography
Human Activities
Humans
Regression Analysis
Rivers
Soil
Trees
description Background: Native Amazonian populations managed forest resources in numerous ways, often creating oligarchic forests dominated by useful trees. The scale and spatial distribution of forest modification beyond pre-Columbian settlements is still unknown, although recent studies propose that human impact away from rivers was minimal. We tested the hypothesis that past human management of the useful tree community decreases with distance from rivers. Methodology/Principal Findings: In six sites, we inventoried trees and palms with DBH≥10 cm and collected soil for charcoal analysis; we also mapped archaeological evidence around the sites. To quantify forest manipulation, we measured the relative abundance, richness and basal area of useful trees and palms. We found a strong negative exponential relationship between forest manipulation and distance to large rivers. Plots located from 10 to 20 km from a main river had 20-40% useful arboreal species, plots between 20 and 40 km had 12-23%, plots more than 40 km had less than 15%. Soil charcoal abundance was high in the two sites closest to secondary rivers, suggesting past agricultural practices. The shortest distance between archaeological evidence and plots was found in sites near rivers. Conclusions/Significance: These results strongly suggest that past forest manipulation was not limited to the pre-Columbian settlements along major rivers, but extended over interfluvial areas considered to be primary forest today. The sustainable use of Amazonian forests will be most effective if it considers the degree of past landscape domestication, as human-modified landscapes concentrate useful plants for human sustainable use and management today. © 2012 Levis et al.
format Artigo
author Levis, Carolina
author2 Souza, Priscila Figueira de
Schietti, Juliana
Emilio, Thaise
Pinto, José Luiz Purri da Veiga
Clement, Charles Roland
Costa, Flávia Regina Capellotto
author2Str Souza, Priscila Figueira de
Schietti, Juliana
Emilio, Thaise
Pinto, José Luiz Purri da Veiga
Clement, Charles Roland
Costa, Flávia Regina Capellotto
title Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia
title_short Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia
title_full Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia
title_fullStr Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia
title_full_unstemmed Historical Human Footprint on Modern Tree Species Composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, Central Amazonia
title_sort historical human footprint on modern tree species composition in the purus-madeira interfluve, central amazonia
publisher PLoS ONE
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/14723
_version_ 1787141302038560768
score 11.653393