Artigo

Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates

Reproduction by individuals is typically recorded as count data (e.g., number of fledglings from a nest or inflorescences on a plant) and commonly modeled using Poisson or negative binomial distributions, which assume that variance is greater than or equal to the mean. However, distributions of repr...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Brooks, Mollie E.
Outros Autores: Kristensen, Kasper, Darrigo, Maria Rosa, Rubim, Paulo, Uríarte, Ma?ia, Bruna, Emilio M., Bolker, Benjamin M.
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: Ecology 2020
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16653
id oai:repositorio:1-16653
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-16653 Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates Brooks, Mollie E. Kristensen, Kasper Darrigo, Maria Rosa Rubim, Paulo Uríarte, Ma?ia Bruna, Emilio M. Bolker, Benjamin M. Ecological Modeling Fecundity Herb Poisson Ratio Population Density Rainfall Reproductive Effort Songbird Heliconia Acuminata Animals Longitudinal Study Poisson Distribution Reproduction Statistical Model Animal Linear Models Longitudinal Studies Models, Statistical Poisson Distribution Reproduction Reproduction by individuals is typically recorded as count data (e.g., number of fledglings from a nest or inflorescences on a plant) and commonly modeled using Poisson or negative binomial distributions, which assume that variance is greater than or equal to the mean. However, distributions of reproductive effort are often underdispersed (i.e., variance < mean). When used in hypothesis tests, models that ignore underdispersion will be overly conservative and may fail to detect significant patterns. Here we show that generalized Poisson (GP) and Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) distributions are better choices for modeling reproductive effort because they can handle both overdispersion and underdispersion; we provide examples of how ecologists can use GP and CMP distributions in generalized linear models (GLMs) and generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to quantify patterns in reproduction. Using a new R package, glmmTMB, we construct GLMMs to investigate how rainfall and population density influence the number of fledglings in the warbler Oreothlypis celata and how flowering rate of Heliconia acuminata differs between fragmented and continuous forest. We also demonstrate how to deal with zero-inflation, which occurs when there are more zeros than expected in the distribution, e.g., due to complete reproductive failure by some individuals. © 2019 by the Ecological Society of America 2020-06-15T21:35:36Z 2020-06-15T21:35:36Z 2019 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16653 10.1002/ecy.2706 en Volume 100, Número 7 Restrito Ecology
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Ecological Modeling
Fecundity
Herb
Poisson Ratio
Population Density
Rainfall
Reproductive Effort
Songbird
Heliconia Acuminata
Animals
Longitudinal Study
Poisson Distribution
Reproduction
Statistical Model
Animal
Linear Models
Longitudinal Studies
Models, Statistical
Poisson Distribution
Reproduction
spellingShingle Ecological Modeling
Fecundity
Herb
Poisson Ratio
Population Density
Rainfall
Reproductive Effort
Songbird
Heliconia Acuminata
Animals
Longitudinal Study
Poisson Distribution
Reproduction
Statistical Model
Animal
Linear Models
Longitudinal Studies
Models, Statistical
Poisson Distribution
Reproduction
Brooks, Mollie E.
Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
topic_facet Ecological Modeling
Fecundity
Herb
Poisson Ratio
Population Density
Rainfall
Reproductive Effort
Songbird
Heliconia Acuminata
Animals
Longitudinal Study
Poisson Distribution
Reproduction
Statistical Model
Animal
Linear Models
Longitudinal Studies
Models, Statistical
Poisson Distribution
Reproduction
description Reproduction by individuals is typically recorded as count data (e.g., number of fledglings from a nest or inflorescences on a plant) and commonly modeled using Poisson or negative binomial distributions, which assume that variance is greater than or equal to the mean. However, distributions of reproductive effort are often underdispersed (i.e., variance < mean). When used in hypothesis tests, models that ignore underdispersion will be overly conservative and may fail to detect significant patterns. Here we show that generalized Poisson (GP) and Conway-Maxwell-Poisson (CMP) distributions are better choices for modeling reproductive effort because they can handle both overdispersion and underdispersion; we provide examples of how ecologists can use GP and CMP distributions in generalized linear models (GLMs) and generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) to quantify patterns in reproduction. Using a new R package, glmmTMB, we construct GLMMs to investigate how rainfall and population density influence the number of fledglings in the warbler Oreothlypis celata and how flowering rate of Heliconia acuminata differs between fragmented and continuous forest. We also demonstrate how to deal with zero-inflation, which occurs when there are more zeros than expected in the distribution, e.g., due to complete reproductive failure by some individuals. © 2019 by the Ecological Society of America
format Artigo
author Brooks, Mollie E.
author2 Kristensen, Kasper
Darrigo, Maria Rosa
Rubim, Paulo
Uríarte, Ma?ia
Bruna, Emilio M.
Bolker, Benjamin M.
author2Str Kristensen, Kasper
Darrigo, Maria Rosa
Rubim, Paulo
Uríarte, Ma?ia
Bruna, Emilio M.
Bolker, Benjamin M.
title Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
title_short Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
title_full Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
title_fullStr Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
title_full_unstemmed Statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
title_sort statistical modeling of patterns in annual reproductive rates
publisher Ecology
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/16653
_version_ 1787141624930762752
score 11.653393