/img alt="Imagem da capa" class="recordcover" src="""/>
Artigo
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
The executive and legislative branches of Brazilian government have either proposed or taken a variety of initiatives that threaten biodiversity and ecosystems. Opposition by the scientific community has largely been ignored by decision-makers. In this short essay, we present recent examples of harm...
Autor principal: | Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de |
---|---|
Outros Autores: | Fearnside, Philip Martin, Oliveira, Caroline S., Padial, André Andrian, Pelicice, Fernando Mayer, Lima-Junior, D. P., Simberloff, Daniel S., Lovejoy, Thomas E., Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de, Orsi, M. L., Agostinho, A. A., Esteves, Franscisco de Assis, dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo, Laurance, William F., Petrere, Miguel, Mormul, Roger Paulo, Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo |
Grau: | Artigo |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
Biodiversity and Conservation
2020
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17113 |
id |
oai:repositorio:1-17113 |
---|---|
recordtype |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:repositorio:1-17113 Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de Fearnside, Philip Martin Oliveira, Caroline S. Padial, André Andrian Pelicice, Fernando Mayer Lima-Junior, D. P. Simberloff, Daniel S. Lovejoy, Thomas E. Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de Orsi, M. L. Agostinho, A. A. Esteves, Franscisco de Assis dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo Laurance, William F. Petrere, Miguel Mormul, Roger Paulo Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo Biodiversity Conservation Management Decision Making Ecosystem Management Environmental Impact Environmental Legislation Governance Approach Natural Capital Neotropical Region Policy Approach Sustainability Brasil The executive and legislative branches of Brazilian government have either proposed or taken a variety of initiatives that threaten biodiversity and ecosystems. Opposition by the scientific community has largely been ignored by decision-makers. In this short essay, we present recent examples of harmful policies that have great potential to erode biodiversity, and we suggest ways to communicate scientific knowledge to decision- makers. If the current gap between conservation science and policies is not filled, the country will threaten the maintenance of its natural capital and, consequently, the sustainability of essential societal activities in the long term. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2020-06-15T21:38:58Z 2020-06-15T21:38:58Z 2017 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17113 10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x en Volume 26, Número 7, Pags. 1745-1752 Restrito Biodiversity and Conservation |
institution |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional |
collection |
INPA-RI |
language |
English |
topic |
Biodiversity Conservation Management Decision Making Ecosystem Management Environmental Impact Environmental Legislation Governance Approach Natural Capital Neotropical Region Policy Approach Sustainability Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Biodiversity Conservation Management Decision Making Ecosystem Management Environmental Impact Environmental Legislation Governance Approach Natural Capital Neotropical Region Policy Approach Sustainability Brasil Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil |
topic_facet |
Biodiversity Conservation Management Decision Making Ecosystem Management Environmental Impact Environmental Legislation Governance Approach Natural Capital Neotropical Region Policy Approach Sustainability Brasil |
description |
The executive and legislative branches of Brazilian government have either proposed or taken a variety of initiatives that threaten biodiversity and ecosystems. Opposition by the scientific community has largely been ignored by decision-makers. In this short essay, we present recent examples of harmful policies that have great potential to erode biodiversity, and we suggest ways to communicate scientific knowledge to decision- makers. If the current gap between conservation science and policies is not filled, the country will threaten the maintenance of its natural capital and, consequently, the sustainability of essential societal activities in the long term. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. |
format |
Artigo |
author |
Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de |
author2 |
Fearnside, Philip Martin Oliveira, Caroline S. Padial, André Andrian Pelicice, Fernando Mayer Lima-Junior, D. P. Simberloff, Daniel S. Lovejoy, Thomas E. Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de Orsi, M. L. Agostinho, A. A. Esteves, Franscisco de Assis dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo Laurance, William F. Petrere, Miguel Mormul, Roger Paulo Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo |
author2Str |
Fearnside, Philip Martin Oliveira, Caroline S. Padial, André Andrian Pelicice, Fernando Mayer Lima-Junior, D. P. Simberloff, Daniel S. Lovejoy, Thomas E. Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de Orsi, M. L. Agostinho, A. A. Esteves, Franscisco de Assis dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo Laurance, William F. Petrere, Miguel Mormul, Roger Paulo Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo |
title |
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil |
title_short |
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil |
title_full |
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil |
title_sort |
removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in brazil |
publisher |
Biodiversity and Conservation |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17113 |
_version_ |
1787143555249078272 |
score |
11.755432 |