Artigo

Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil

The executive and legislative branches of Brazilian government have either proposed or taken a variety of initiatives that threaten biodiversity and ecosystems. Opposition by the scientific community has largely been ignored by decision-makers. In this short essay, we present recent examples of harm...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de
Outros Autores: Fearnside, Philip Martin, Oliveira, Caroline S., Padial, André Andrian, Pelicice, Fernando Mayer, Lima-Junior, D. P., Simberloff, Daniel S., Lovejoy, Thomas E., Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de, Orsi, M. L., Agostinho, A. A., Esteves, Franscisco de Assis, dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo, Laurance, William F., Petrere, Miguel, Mormul, Roger Paulo, Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: Biodiversity and Conservation 2020
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17113
id oai:repositorio:1-17113
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-17113 Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de Fearnside, Philip Martin Oliveira, Caroline S. Padial, André Andrian Pelicice, Fernando Mayer Lima-Junior, D. P. Simberloff, Daniel S. Lovejoy, Thomas E. Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de Orsi, M. L. Agostinho, A. A. Esteves, Franscisco de Assis dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo Laurance, William F. Petrere, Miguel Mormul, Roger Paulo Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo Biodiversity Conservation Management Decision Making Ecosystem Management Environmental Impact Environmental Legislation Governance Approach Natural Capital Neotropical Region Policy Approach Sustainability Brasil The executive and legislative branches of Brazilian government have either proposed or taken a variety of initiatives that threaten biodiversity and ecosystems. Opposition by the scientific community has largely been ignored by decision-makers. In this short essay, we present recent examples of harmful policies that have great potential to erode biodiversity, and we suggest ways to communicate scientific knowledge to decision- makers. If the current gap between conservation science and policies is not filled, the country will threaten the maintenance of its natural capital and, consequently, the sustainability of essential societal activities in the long term. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. 2020-06-15T21:38:58Z 2020-06-15T21:38:58Z 2017 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17113 10.1007/s10531-017-1316-x en Volume 26, Número 7, Pags. 1745-1752 Restrito Biodiversity and Conservation
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Biodiversity
Conservation Management
Decision Making
Ecosystem Management
Environmental Impact
Environmental Legislation
Governance Approach
Natural Capital
Neotropical Region
Policy Approach
Sustainability
Brasil
spellingShingle Biodiversity
Conservation Management
Decision Making
Ecosystem Management
Environmental Impact
Environmental Legislation
Governance Approach
Natural Capital
Neotropical Region
Policy Approach
Sustainability
Brasil
Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de
Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
topic_facet Biodiversity
Conservation Management
Decision Making
Ecosystem Management
Environmental Impact
Environmental Legislation
Governance Approach
Natural Capital
Neotropical Region
Policy Approach
Sustainability
Brasil
description The executive and legislative branches of Brazilian government have either proposed or taken a variety of initiatives that threaten biodiversity and ecosystems. Opposition by the scientific community has largely been ignored by decision-makers. In this short essay, we present recent examples of harmful policies that have great potential to erode biodiversity, and we suggest ways to communicate scientific knowledge to decision- makers. If the current gap between conservation science and policies is not filled, the country will threaten the maintenance of its natural capital and, consequently, the sustainability of essential societal activities in the long term. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
format Artigo
author Azevedo-Santos, Valter Monteiro de
author2 Fearnside, Philip Martin
Oliveira, Caroline S.
Padial, André Andrian
Pelicice, Fernando Mayer
Lima-Junior, D. P.
Simberloff, Daniel S.
Lovejoy, Thomas E.
Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de
Orsi, M. L.
Agostinho, A. A.
Esteves, Franscisco de Assis
dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo
Laurance, William F.
Petrere, Miguel
Mormul, Roger Paulo
Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo
author2Str Fearnside, Philip Martin
Oliveira, Caroline S.
Padial, André Andrian
Pelicice, Fernando Mayer
Lima-Junior, D. P.
Simberloff, Daniel S.
Lovejoy, Thomas E.
Magalhães, André Lincoln Barroso de
Orsi, M. L.
Agostinho, A. A.
Esteves, Franscisco de Assis
dos Santos Pompeu, Paulo
Laurance, William F.
Petrere, Miguel
Mormul, Roger Paulo
Simões Vitule, Jean Ricardo
title Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
title_short Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
title_full Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
title_fullStr Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in Brazil
title_sort removing the abyss between conservation science and policy decisions in brazil
publisher Biodiversity and Conservation
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17113
_version_ 1787143555249078272
score 11.755432