Artigo

Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia

Pitheciids are known for their frugivorous diets, but there has been no broad-scale comparison of fruit genera used by these primates that range across five geographic regions in South America. We compiled 31 fruit lists from data collected from 18 species (three Cacajao, six Callicebus, five Chirop...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Boyle, Sarah Ann
Outros Autores: Thompson, Cynthia L., DeLuycker, Anneke M., Alvarez, Silvia J., Alvim, Thiago H G, Aquino, Rolando, Bezerra, Bruna, Boubli, Jean Philippe, Bowler, Mark T., Caselli, Christini Barbosa, Chagas, Renata Rocha Déda, Francis Ferrari, Stephen, Fontes, Isadora P., Gregory, Tremaine, Haugaasen, Torbjørn, Heiduck, Stefanie, Hores, Rose, Lehman, Shawn M., Melo, Fabiano Rodrigues de, Moreira, Leandro Santana, Moura, Viviane Sodré, Nagy-Reis, Mariana B., Palacios, Erwin, Palminteri, Suzanne, Peres, Carlos A., Pinto, Líliam Patrícia, Port-Carvalho, Marcio, Rodríguez, Adriana, Santos, Ricardo Rodrigues dos, Setz, Eleonore Zulnara Freire, Shaffer, Christopher A., Silva, Felipe Ennes, Soares da Silva, Rafaela Fatima, Souza-Alves, João Pedro, Trevelin, Leonardo Carreira, Veiga, Liza M., Vieira, Tatiana Martins, Dubose, Mary E., Barnett, Adrian Ashton
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: American Journal of Primatology 2020
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17340
id oai:repositorio:1-17340
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-17340 Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia Boyle, Sarah Ann Thompson, Cynthia L. DeLuycker, Anneke M. Alvarez, Silvia J. Alvim, Thiago H G Aquino, Rolando Bezerra, Bruna Boubli, Jean Philippe Bowler, Mark T. Caselli, Christini Barbosa Chagas, Renata Rocha Déda Francis Ferrari, Stephen Fontes, Isadora P. Gregory, Tremaine Haugaasen, Torbjørn Heiduck, Stefanie Hores, Rose Lehman, Shawn M. Melo, Fabiano Rodrigues de Moreira, Leandro Santana Moura, Viviane Sodré Nagy-Reis, Mariana B. Palacios, Erwin Palminteri, Suzanne Peres, Carlos A. Pinto, Líliam Patrícia Port-Carvalho, Marcio Rodríguez, Adriana Santos, Ricardo Rodrigues dos Setz, Eleonore Zulnara Freire Shaffer, Christopher A. Silva, Felipe Ennes Soares da Silva, Rafaela Fatima Souza-Alves, João Pedro Trevelin, Leonardo Carreira Veiga, Liza M. Vieira, Tatiana Martins Dubose, Mary E. Barnett, Adrian Ashton Comparative Study Diet Feeding Ecology Food Consumption Forest Ecosystem Frugivory Fruit Geographical Variation Habitat Mosaic Phylogenetics Plant Community Primate Regional Pattern Sampling Species Richness South America Cacajao Callicebus Chiropotes Cyrilla Pithecia Pithecia Pitheciidae Primates Animals Classification Diet Ecosystem Forest Fruit Geography Herbivory Phylogeography Physiology Pitheciidae Plant Veterinary Animal Diet Ecosystem Forests Fruit Geography Herbivory Phylogeography Pitheciidae Plants Pitheciids are known for their frugivorous diets, but there has been no broad-scale comparison of fruit genera used by these primates that range across five geographic regions in South America. We compiled 31 fruit lists from data collected from 18 species (three Cacajao, six Callicebus, five Chiropotes, and four Pithecia) at 26 study sites in six countries. Together, these lists contained 455 plant genera from 96 families. We predicted that 1) closely related Chiropotes and Cacajao would demonstrate the greatest similarity in fruit lists; 2) pitheciids living in closer geographic proximity would have greater similarities in fruit lists; and 3) fruit genus richness would be lower in lists from forest fragments than continuous forests. Fruit genus richness was greatest for the composite Chiropotes list, even though Pithecia had the greatest overall sampling effort. We also found that the Callicebus composite fruit list had lower similarity scores in comparison with the composite food lists of the other three genera (both within and between geographic areas). Chiropotes and Pithecia showed strongest similarities in fruit lists, followed by sister taxa Chiropotes and Cacajao. Overall, pitheciids in closer proximity had more similarities in their fruit list, and this pattern was evident in the fruit lists for both Callicebus and Chiropotes. There was no difference in the number of fruit genera used by pitheciids in habitat fragments and continuous forest. Our findings demonstrate that pitheciids use a variety of fruit genera, but phylogenetic and geographic patterns in fruit use are not consistent across all pitheciid genera. This study represents the most extensive examination of pitheciid fruit consumption to date, but future research is needed to investigate the extent to which the trends in fruit genus richness noted here are attributable to habitat differences among study sites, differences in feeding ecology, or a combination of both. Am. J. Primatol. 78:493-506, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2020-06-15T21:41:30Z 2020-06-15T21:41:30Z 2016 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17340 10.1002/ajp.22422 en Volume 78, Número 5, Pags. 493-506 Restrito American Journal of Primatology
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Comparative Study
Diet
Feeding Ecology
Food Consumption
Forest Ecosystem
Frugivory
Fruit
Geographical Variation
Habitat Mosaic
Phylogenetics
Plant Community
Primate
Regional Pattern
Sampling
Species Richness
South America
Cacajao
Callicebus
Chiropotes
Cyrilla
Pithecia Pithecia
Pitheciidae
Primates
Animals
Classification
Diet
Ecosystem
Forest
Fruit
Geography
Herbivory
Phylogeography
Physiology
Pitheciidae
Plant
Veterinary
Animal
Diet
Ecosystem
Forests
Fruit
Geography
Herbivory
Phylogeography
Pitheciidae
Plants
spellingShingle Comparative Study
Diet
Feeding Ecology
Food Consumption
Forest Ecosystem
Frugivory
Fruit
Geographical Variation
Habitat Mosaic
Phylogenetics
Plant Community
Primate
Regional Pattern
Sampling
Species Richness
South America
Cacajao
Callicebus
Chiropotes
Cyrilla
Pithecia Pithecia
Pitheciidae
Primates
Animals
Classification
Diet
Ecosystem
Forest
Fruit
Geography
Herbivory
Phylogeography
Physiology
Pitheciidae
Plant
Veterinary
Animal
Diet
Ecosystem
Forests
Fruit
Geography
Herbivory
Phylogeography
Pitheciidae
Plants
Boyle, Sarah Ann
Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia
topic_facet Comparative Study
Diet
Feeding Ecology
Food Consumption
Forest Ecosystem
Frugivory
Fruit
Geographical Variation
Habitat Mosaic
Phylogenetics
Plant Community
Primate
Regional Pattern
Sampling
Species Richness
South America
Cacajao
Callicebus
Chiropotes
Cyrilla
Pithecia Pithecia
Pitheciidae
Primates
Animals
Classification
Diet
Ecosystem
Forest
Fruit
Geography
Herbivory
Phylogeography
Physiology
Pitheciidae
Plant
Veterinary
Animal
Diet
Ecosystem
Forests
Fruit
Geography
Herbivory
Phylogeography
Pitheciidae
Plants
description Pitheciids are known for their frugivorous diets, but there has been no broad-scale comparison of fruit genera used by these primates that range across five geographic regions in South America. We compiled 31 fruit lists from data collected from 18 species (three Cacajao, six Callicebus, five Chiropotes, and four Pithecia) at 26 study sites in six countries. Together, these lists contained 455 plant genera from 96 families. We predicted that 1) closely related Chiropotes and Cacajao would demonstrate the greatest similarity in fruit lists; 2) pitheciids living in closer geographic proximity would have greater similarities in fruit lists; and 3) fruit genus richness would be lower in lists from forest fragments than continuous forests. Fruit genus richness was greatest for the composite Chiropotes list, even though Pithecia had the greatest overall sampling effort. We also found that the Callicebus composite fruit list had lower similarity scores in comparison with the composite food lists of the other three genera (both within and between geographic areas). Chiropotes and Pithecia showed strongest similarities in fruit lists, followed by sister taxa Chiropotes and Cacajao. Overall, pitheciids in closer proximity had more similarities in their fruit list, and this pattern was evident in the fruit lists for both Callicebus and Chiropotes. There was no difference in the number of fruit genera used by pitheciids in habitat fragments and continuous forest. Our findings demonstrate that pitheciids use a variety of fruit genera, but phylogenetic and geographic patterns in fruit use are not consistent across all pitheciid genera. This study represents the most extensive examination of pitheciid fruit consumption to date, but future research is needed to investigate the extent to which the trends in fruit genus richness noted here are attributable to habitat differences among study sites, differences in feeding ecology, or a combination of both. Am. J. Primatol. 78:493-506, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
format Artigo
author Boyle, Sarah Ann
author2 Thompson, Cynthia L.
DeLuycker, Anneke M.
Alvarez, Silvia J.
Alvim, Thiago H G
Aquino, Rolando
Bezerra, Bruna
Boubli, Jean Philippe
Bowler, Mark T.
Caselli, Christini Barbosa
Chagas, Renata Rocha Déda
Francis Ferrari, Stephen
Fontes, Isadora P.
Gregory, Tremaine
Haugaasen, Torbjørn
Heiduck, Stefanie
Hores, Rose
Lehman, Shawn M.
Melo, Fabiano Rodrigues de
Moreira, Leandro Santana
Moura, Viviane Sodré
Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
Palacios, Erwin
Palminteri, Suzanne
Peres, Carlos A.
Pinto, Líliam Patrícia
Port-Carvalho, Marcio
Rodríguez, Adriana
Santos, Ricardo Rodrigues dos
Setz, Eleonore Zulnara Freire
Shaffer, Christopher A.
Silva, Felipe Ennes
Soares da Silva, Rafaela Fatima
Souza-Alves, João Pedro
Trevelin, Leonardo Carreira
Veiga, Liza M.
Vieira, Tatiana Martins
Dubose, Mary E.
Barnett, Adrian Ashton
author2Str Thompson, Cynthia L.
DeLuycker, Anneke M.
Alvarez, Silvia J.
Alvim, Thiago H G
Aquino, Rolando
Bezerra, Bruna
Boubli, Jean Philippe
Bowler, Mark T.
Caselli, Christini Barbosa
Chagas, Renata Rocha Déda
Francis Ferrari, Stephen
Fontes, Isadora P.
Gregory, Tremaine
Haugaasen, Torbjørn
Heiduck, Stefanie
Hores, Rose
Lehman, Shawn M.
Melo, Fabiano Rodrigues de
Moreira, Leandro Santana
Moura, Viviane Sodré
Nagy-Reis, Mariana B.
Palacios, Erwin
Palminteri, Suzanne
Peres, Carlos A.
Pinto, Líliam Patrícia
Port-Carvalho, Marcio
Rodríguez, Adriana
Santos, Ricardo Rodrigues dos
Setz, Eleonore Zulnara Freire
Shaffer, Christopher A.
Silva, Felipe Ennes
Soares da Silva, Rafaela Fatima
Souza-Alves, João Pedro
Trevelin, Leonardo Carreira
Veiga, Liza M.
Vieira, Tatiana Martins
Dubose, Mary E.
Barnett, Adrian Ashton
title Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia
title_short Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia
title_full Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia
title_fullStr Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia
title_full_unstemmed Geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids Cacajao, Callicebus, Chiropotes, and Pithecia
title_sort geographic comparison of plant genera used in frugivory among the pitheciids cacajao, callicebus, chiropotes, and pithecia
publisher American Journal of Primatology
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/17340
_version_ 1787142763978948608
score 11.653393