Artigo

Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon

Synbranchidae belongs to the Synbranchiformes and occurs in Africa, Asia, Australia, Mexico, and Central and South America. This family comprises four genera: Synbranchus, Ophisternon, Monopterus, and Macrotrema. Only two are known from the neotropical region, Ophisternon and Synbranchus. According...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Carvalho, Natália Dayane Moura
Outros Autores: Gross, Maria Claudia, Schneider, Carlos Henrique, Terêncio, Maria Leandra, Zuanon, Jansen, Feldberg, Eliana
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: Genetica 2020
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18033
id oai:repositorio:1-18033
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-18033 Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon Carvalho, Natália Dayane Moura Gross, Maria Claudia Schneider, Carlos Henrique Terêncio, Maria Leandra Zuanon, Jansen Feldberg, Eliana Ribosome Dna Animals Chromosome Chromosome Analysis Chromosome Banding Pattern Comparative Study In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Genetics Karyotype Smegmamorpha Animal Chromosome Banding Chromosomes Cytogenetic Analysis Ribosomal Dna In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence Karyotype Smegmamorpha Ophisternon Synbranchidae Synbranchiformes Synbranchus Synbranchus Marmoratus Synbranchidae belongs to the Synbranchiformes and occurs in Africa, Asia, Australia, Mexico, and Central and South America. This family comprises four genera: Synbranchus, Ophisternon, Monopterus, and Macrotrema. Only two are known from the neotropical region, Ophisternon and Synbranchus. According to current classification, Synbranchus has three valid species: S. marmoratus (Bloch 1795), S. madeirae (Rosen and Rumney 1972), and S. lampreia (Favorito, Zanata and Assumpção 2005). Thus the present research is aimed to cytogenetically characterize (by classical and molecular methods) two syntopic species-S. aff. lampreia and S. madeirae-from the central Amazon basin to validate the taxonomy of both species and provide a revisionary discussion on the cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes. Synbranchus aff. lampreia was found to possess 2n = 44 chromosomes (6 m + 2st + 36a, NF = 50), while S. madeirae had 2n = 46 chromosomes (6 m + 2st + 38a, NF = 52). Constitutive heterochromatin was dominant in the centromeric and terminal regions of most of the chromosomes in both species, although the precise distribution patterns were species-specific. The nucleolar organizing region was single in S. aff. lampreia and multiple in S. madeirae, as indicated by both AgNO3 and hybridization using 18S rDNA probes. The 5S rDNA sites were located interstitially on the long arms of an acrocentric pair in both species, and the telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sites in either species. These data indicate the occurrence of interspecific karyotypic variability in Synbranchus and suggest that taxonomic review for this genus is necessary. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2020-06-15T21:51:07Z 2020-06-15T21:51:07Z 2012 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18033 10.1007/s10709-012-9666-5 en Volume 140, Número 4-6, Pags. 149-158 Restrito Genetica
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Ribosome Dna
Animals
Chromosome
Chromosome Analysis
Chromosome Banding Pattern
Comparative Study
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Genetics
Karyotype
Smegmamorpha
Animal
Chromosome Banding
Chromosomes
Cytogenetic Analysis
Ribosomal Dna
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Karyotype
Smegmamorpha
Ophisternon
Synbranchidae
Synbranchiformes
Synbranchus
Synbranchus Marmoratus
spellingShingle Ribosome Dna
Animals
Chromosome
Chromosome Analysis
Chromosome Banding Pattern
Comparative Study
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Genetics
Karyotype
Smegmamorpha
Animal
Chromosome Banding
Chromosomes
Cytogenetic Analysis
Ribosomal Dna
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Karyotype
Smegmamorpha
Ophisternon
Synbranchidae
Synbranchiformes
Synbranchus
Synbranchus Marmoratus
Carvalho, Natália Dayane Moura
Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon
topic_facet Ribosome Dna
Animals
Chromosome
Chromosome Analysis
Chromosome Banding Pattern
Comparative Study
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Genetics
Karyotype
Smegmamorpha
Animal
Chromosome Banding
Chromosomes
Cytogenetic Analysis
Ribosomal Dna
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Karyotype
Smegmamorpha
Ophisternon
Synbranchidae
Synbranchiformes
Synbranchus
Synbranchus Marmoratus
description Synbranchidae belongs to the Synbranchiformes and occurs in Africa, Asia, Australia, Mexico, and Central and South America. This family comprises four genera: Synbranchus, Ophisternon, Monopterus, and Macrotrema. Only two are known from the neotropical region, Ophisternon and Synbranchus. According to current classification, Synbranchus has three valid species: S. marmoratus (Bloch 1795), S. madeirae (Rosen and Rumney 1972), and S. lampreia (Favorito, Zanata and Assumpção 2005). Thus the present research is aimed to cytogenetically characterize (by classical and molecular methods) two syntopic species-S. aff. lampreia and S. madeirae-from the central Amazon basin to validate the taxonomy of both species and provide a revisionary discussion on the cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes. Synbranchus aff. lampreia was found to possess 2n = 44 chromosomes (6 m + 2st + 36a, NF = 50), while S. madeirae had 2n = 46 chromosomes (6 m + 2st + 38a, NF = 52). Constitutive heterochromatin was dominant in the centromeric and terminal regions of most of the chromosomes in both species, although the precise distribution patterns were species-specific. The nucleolar organizing region was single in S. aff. lampreia and multiple in S. madeirae, as indicated by both AgNO3 and hybridization using 18S rDNA probes. The 5S rDNA sites were located interstitially on the long arms of an acrocentric pair in both species, and the telomeric probe did not show any interstitial sites in either species. These data indicate the occurrence of interspecific karyotypic variability in Synbranchus and suggest that taxonomic review for this genus is necessary. © 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
format Artigo
author Carvalho, Natália Dayane Moura
author2 Gross, Maria Claudia
Schneider, Carlos Henrique
Terêncio, Maria Leandra
Zuanon, Jansen
Feldberg, Eliana
author2Str Gross, Maria Claudia
Schneider, Carlos Henrique
Terêncio, Maria Leandra
Zuanon, Jansen
Feldberg, Eliana
title Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon
title_short Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon
title_full Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon
title_fullStr Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Cytogenetics of Synbranchiformes: A comparative analysis of two Synbranchus Bloch, 1795 species from the Amazon
title_sort cytogenetics of synbranchiformes: a comparative analysis of two synbranchus bloch, 1795 species from the amazon
publisher Genetica
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18033
_version_ 1787144719880421376
score 11.755432