Artigo

Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests

The allocation and cycling of carbon (C) within forests is an important component of the biospheric C cycle, but is particularly understudied within tropical forests. We synthesise reported and unpublished results from three lowland rainforest sites in Amazonia (in the regions of Manaus, Tapajós and...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Malhi, Yadvinder Singh
Outros Autores: Aragao, L. E.O.C., Metcalfe, Daniel B., Paiva, Romilda Q., Quesada, Carlos Alberto, Almeida, Samuel Miranda, Anderson, Liana Oighenstein, Brando, Paulo Monteiro, Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin, Costa, Antônio Carlos Lôla da, Hutyra, Lucy R., Oliveira, Paulo J.C., Patiño, Sandra, Pyle, Elizabeth Hammond, Robertson, Amanda L., Teixeira, Liliane Martins
Grau: Artigo
Idioma: English
Publicado em: Global Change Biology 2020
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18443
id oai:repositorio:1-18443
recordtype dspace
spelling oai:repositorio:1-18443 Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests Malhi, Yadvinder Singh Aragao, L. E.O.C. Metcalfe, Daniel B. Paiva, Romilda Q. Quesada, Carlos Alberto Almeida, Samuel Miranda Anderson, Liana Oighenstein Brando, Paulo Monteiro Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin Costa, Antônio Carlos Lôla da Hutyra, Lucy R. Oliveira, Paulo J.C. Patiño, Sandra Pyle, Elizabeth Hammond Robertson, Amanda L. Teixeira, Liliane Martins Carbon Cycle Carbon Sequestration Litterfall Net Primary Production Soil Respiration Tropical Forest Amazonia South America The allocation and cycling of carbon (C) within forests is an important component of the biospheric C cycle, but is particularly understudied within tropical forests. We synthesise reported and unpublished results from three lowland rainforest sites in Amazonia (in the regions of Manaus, Tapajós and Caxiuanã), all major sites of the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Programme (LBA). We attempt a comprehensive synthesis of the C stocks, nutrient status and, particularly, the allocation and internal C dynamics of all three sites. The calculated net primary productivities (NPP) are 10.1 ± 1.4 MgC ha-1 yr-1 (Manaus), 14.4 ± 1.3 Mg Cha-1 yr-1 (Tapajós) and 10.0 ± 1.2MgCha-1 yr-1 (Caxiuanã). All errors bars report standard errors. Soil and leaf nutrient analyses indicate that Tapajós has significantly more plant-available phosphorus and calcium. Autotrophic respiration at all three sites (14.9-21.4 Mg Cha yr-1) is more challenging to measure, with the largest component and greatest source of uncertainty being leaf dark respiration. Comparison of measured soil respiration with that predicted from C cycling measurements provides an independent constraint. It shows general good agreement at all three sites, with perhaps some evidence for measured soil respiration being less than expected. Twenty to thirty percent of fixed C is allocated belowground. Comparison of gross primary productivity (GPP), derived from ecosystem flux measurements with that derived from component studies (NPP plus autotrophic respiration) provides an additional crosscheck. The two approaches are in good agreement, giving increased confidence in both approaches to estimating GPP. The ecosystem carbon-use efficiency (CUEs), the ratio of NPP to GPP, is similar at Manaus (0.34 ± 0.10) and Caxiuanã (0.32 ± 0.07), but may be higher at Tapajós (0.49 ± 0.16), although the difference is not significant. Old growth or infertile tropical forests may have low CUE compared with recently disturbed and/or fertile forests. © Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing. 2020-06-15T21:55:06Z 2020-06-15T21:55:06Z 2009 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18443 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01780.x en Volume 15, Número 5, Pags. 1255-1274 Restrito Global Change Biology
institution Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional
collection INPA-RI
language English
topic Carbon Cycle
Carbon Sequestration
Litterfall
Net Primary Production
Soil Respiration
Tropical Forest
Amazonia
South America
spellingShingle Carbon Cycle
Carbon Sequestration
Litterfall
Net Primary Production
Soil Respiration
Tropical Forest
Amazonia
South America
Malhi, Yadvinder Singh
Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests
topic_facet Carbon Cycle
Carbon Sequestration
Litterfall
Net Primary Production
Soil Respiration
Tropical Forest
Amazonia
South America
description The allocation and cycling of carbon (C) within forests is an important component of the biospheric C cycle, but is particularly understudied within tropical forests. We synthesise reported and unpublished results from three lowland rainforest sites in Amazonia (in the regions of Manaus, Tapajós and Caxiuanã), all major sites of the Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Programme (LBA). We attempt a comprehensive synthesis of the C stocks, nutrient status and, particularly, the allocation and internal C dynamics of all three sites. The calculated net primary productivities (NPP) are 10.1 ± 1.4 MgC ha-1 yr-1 (Manaus), 14.4 ± 1.3 Mg Cha-1 yr-1 (Tapajós) and 10.0 ± 1.2MgCha-1 yr-1 (Caxiuanã). All errors bars report standard errors. Soil and leaf nutrient analyses indicate that Tapajós has significantly more plant-available phosphorus and calcium. Autotrophic respiration at all three sites (14.9-21.4 Mg Cha yr-1) is more challenging to measure, with the largest component and greatest source of uncertainty being leaf dark respiration. Comparison of measured soil respiration with that predicted from C cycling measurements provides an independent constraint. It shows general good agreement at all three sites, with perhaps some evidence for measured soil respiration being less than expected. Twenty to thirty percent of fixed C is allocated belowground. Comparison of gross primary productivity (GPP), derived from ecosystem flux measurements with that derived from component studies (NPP plus autotrophic respiration) provides an additional crosscheck. The two approaches are in good agreement, giving increased confidence in both approaches to estimating GPP. The ecosystem carbon-use efficiency (CUEs), the ratio of NPP to GPP, is similar at Manaus (0.34 ± 0.10) and Caxiuanã (0.32 ± 0.07), but may be higher at Tapajós (0.49 ± 0.16), although the difference is not significant. Old growth or infertile tropical forests may have low CUE compared with recently disturbed and/or fertile forests. © Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing.
format Artigo
author Malhi, Yadvinder Singh
author2 Aragao, L. E.O.C.
Metcalfe, Daniel B.
Paiva, Romilda Q.
Quesada, Carlos Alberto
Almeida, Samuel Miranda
Anderson, Liana Oighenstein
Brando, Paulo Monteiro
Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin
Costa, Antônio Carlos Lôla da
Hutyra, Lucy R.
Oliveira, Paulo J.C.
Patiño, Sandra
Pyle, Elizabeth Hammond
Robertson, Amanda L.
Teixeira, Liliane Martins
author2Str Aragao, L. E.O.C.
Metcalfe, Daniel B.
Paiva, Romilda Q.
Quesada, Carlos Alberto
Almeida, Samuel Miranda
Anderson, Liana Oighenstein
Brando, Paulo Monteiro
Chambers, Jeffrey Quintin
Costa, Antônio Carlos Lôla da
Hutyra, Lucy R.
Oliveira, Paulo J.C.
Patiño, Sandra
Pyle, Elizabeth Hammond
Robertson, Amanda L.
Teixeira, Liliane Martins
title Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests
title_short Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests
title_full Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests
title_fullStr Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests
title_full_unstemmed Comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three Amazonian forests
title_sort comprehensive assessment of carbon productivity, allocation and storage in three amazonian forests
publisher Global Change Biology
publishDate 2020
url https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/18443
_version_ 1787142279800029184
score 11.653393