Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options
Sustained management of Amazonian forest is nonexistent on a commercial scale and is in its infancy as a research front. Systems are under trial in Brazil, Surinam, French Guiana and Peru to overcome technical barriers to sustained production. The low priority that has been given to developing and i...
| Autor principal: | Fearnside, Philip Martin |
|---|---|
| Grau: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | English |
| Publicado em: |
Forest Ecology and Management
2020
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19591 |
| id |
oai:repositorio:1-19591 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:repositorio:1-19591 Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options Fearnside, Philip Martin Economic Calculation Environmental Cost Forest Management Forestry Indians Management Sustainability Brasil Brazil, Amazonia French Guiana French Guiana, Amazonia Peru Peru, Amazonia South America, Amazonia Suriname Suriname, Amazonia Sustained management of Amazonian forest is nonexistent on a commercial scale and is in its infancy as a research front. Systems are under trial in Brazil, Surinam, French Guiana and Peru to overcome technical barriers to sustained production. The low priority that has been given to developing and implementing sustainable systems is a reflection of the low weight given to future costs and benefits in presently-used economic calculations. An examination of presently used criteria in Amazonia suggests that they do not lead to development choices that are in the best interests of the region. Problems include: the lack of connection between discount rates applied to future returns and the biological rates limiting forest growth; inappropriate accounting for environmental and social factors; and common property effects - including the distribution of environmental costs. The result is destruction of the forest, along with its potential for sustainable production through forestry management. Alternatives must be evaluated on the basis of their contribution to the well-being of the present residents of the Amazon region and their descendants. © 1989. 2020-06-15T22:10:22Z 2020-06-15T22:10:22Z 1989 Artigo https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19591 10.1016/0378-1127(89)90083-2 en Volume 27, Número 1, Pags. 61-79 Restrito Forest Ecology and Management |
| institution |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional |
| collection |
INPA-RI |
| language |
English |
| topic |
Economic Calculation Environmental Cost Forest Management Forestry Indians Management Sustainability Brasil Brazil, Amazonia French Guiana French Guiana, Amazonia Peru Peru, Amazonia South America, Amazonia Suriname Suriname, Amazonia |
| spellingShingle |
Economic Calculation Environmental Cost Forest Management Forestry Indians Management Sustainability Brasil Brazil, Amazonia French Guiana French Guiana, Amazonia Peru Peru, Amazonia South America, Amazonia Suriname Suriname, Amazonia Fearnside, Philip Martin Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| topic_facet |
Economic Calculation Environmental Cost Forest Management Forestry Indians Management Sustainability Brasil Brazil, Amazonia French Guiana French Guiana, Amazonia Peru Peru, Amazonia South America, Amazonia Suriname Suriname, Amazonia |
| description |
Sustained management of Amazonian forest is nonexistent on a commercial scale and is in its infancy as a research front. Systems are under trial in Brazil, Surinam, French Guiana and Peru to overcome technical barriers to sustained production. The low priority that has been given to developing and implementing sustainable systems is a reflection of the low weight given to future costs and benefits in presently-used economic calculations. An examination of presently used criteria in Amazonia suggests that they do not lead to development choices that are in the best interests of the region. Problems include: the lack of connection between discount rates applied to future returns and the biological rates limiting forest growth; inappropriate accounting for environmental and social factors; and common property effects - including the distribution of environmental costs. The result is destruction of the forest, along with its potential for sustainable production through forestry management. Alternatives must be evaluated on the basis of their contribution to the well-being of the present residents of the Amazon region and their descendants. © 1989. |
| format |
Artigo |
| author |
Fearnside, Philip Martin |
| title |
Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| title_short |
Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| title_full |
Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| title_fullStr |
Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Forest management in Amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| title_sort |
forest management in amazonia: the need for new criteria in evaluating development options |
| publisher |
Forest Ecology and Management |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19591 |
| _version_ |
1787141071838380032 |
| score |
11.755432 |