Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm?
At least three classic systems of nursery pollination mutualism are known: the fig (Ficus, Moraceae) – agaonid (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) association (Cook and Rasplus 2003), the yucca (Yucca, Hesperoyucca; Agavaceae) – yucca moths (Tegeticula, Parategeticula; Lepidoptera, Prodoxidae) association (...
| Autor principal: | Cruaud, Astrid |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | Cook, James, Da-Rong, Yang, Genson, Gwenaélle S., Jabbour-Zahab, Roula, Kjellberg, Finn, Augusto Santinelo Pereira, Rodrigo, Rønsted, Nina, Santos-Mattos, Otilene, Savolainen, Vincent, Ubaidillah, Rosichon, van Noort, Simon, Yan-Qiong, Peng, Rasplus, Jean Yves |
| Grau: | Capítulo de Livro |
| Idioma: | English |
| Publicado em: |
The Systematics Association Special Volume 81: Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships
2020
|
| Acesso em linha: |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19916 |
| id |
oai:repositorio:1-19916 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:repositorio:1-19916 Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? Cruaud, Astrid Cook, James Da-Rong, Yang Genson, Gwenaélle S. Jabbour-Zahab, Roula Kjellberg, Finn Augusto Santinelo Pereira, Rodrigo Rønsted, Nina Santos-Mattos, Otilene Savolainen, Vincent Ubaidillah, Rosichon van Noort, Simon Yan-Qiong, Peng Rasplus, Jean Yves At least three classic systems of nursery pollination mutualism are known: the fig (Ficus, Moraceae) – agaonid (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) association (Cook and Rasplus 2003), the yucca (Yucca, Hesperoyucca; Agavaceae) – yucca moths (Tegeticula, Parategeticula; Lepidoptera, Prodoxidae) association (Pellmyr 2003) and the Glodichion (Phyllanthaceae) – Epicephala moths (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) association (Kato et al. 2003). All these mutualisms are obligate, which means that each partner depends on the other for its own reproductive success. The insect pollinates the flowers and oviposits in the plant ovaries where the insect larvae subsequently feed on a subset of the developing seeds. A shift from mutualism to parasitism by the pollinating insect would lead to reproduction failure of the plant and, without host shift, to the extinction of both lineages. Therefore, the speciation of mutualistic pollinators is generally believed to be driven by the speciation of their host-plants. In this hypothesis, when an ancestral plant species splits into two daughter species, its mutualistic pollinator also splits. This scenario should result in perfect congruence of hosts and pollinator phylogenies (Farenholz's rule) (Farenholz 1913). However, this seems increasingly unlikely. Indeed, more and more studies on different coevolved associations show that a strict Farenholz's rule is not respected, even when a high level of host specificity exists (e.g. Paterson and Banks 2001; Desdevises et al. 2002; Charleston and Perkins 2006). Topological incongruence between host and associate phylogenetic trees can result from processes like host switching, sorting events (extinction and lineage sorting), duplication events (speciation of the parasite independent of the host), and failure of the associate to diverge when the host diverges (“missing the boat”) (Page 1991; Page 1994; Page and Charleston 1998; Legendre et al. 2002; Charleston and Perkins 2006). © The Systematics Association 2012. 2020-06-16T15:04:42Z 2020-06-16T15:04:42Z 2011 Capítulo de Livro https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19916 10.1017/CBO9781139014113.005 en Pags. 68-102 Restrito The Systematics Association Special Volume 81: Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships |
| institution |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia - Repositório Institucional |
| collection |
INPA-RI |
| language |
English |
| description |
At least three classic systems of nursery pollination mutualism are known: the fig (Ficus, Moraceae) – agaonid (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea) association (Cook and Rasplus 2003), the yucca (Yucca, Hesperoyucca; Agavaceae) – yucca moths (Tegeticula, Parategeticula; Lepidoptera, Prodoxidae) association (Pellmyr 2003) and the Glodichion (Phyllanthaceae) – Epicephala moths (Lepidoptera, Gracillariidae) association (Kato et al. 2003). All these mutualisms are obligate, which means that each partner depends on the other for its own reproductive success. The insect pollinates the flowers and oviposits in the plant ovaries where the insect larvae subsequently feed on a subset of the developing seeds. A shift from mutualism to parasitism by the pollinating insect would lead to reproduction failure of the plant and, without host shift, to the extinction of both lineages. Therefore, the speciation of mutualistic pollinators is generally believed to be driven by the speciation of their host-plants. In this hypothesis, when an ancestral plant species splits into two daughter species, its mutualistic pollinator also splits. This scenario should result in perfect congruence of hosts and pollinator phylogenies (Farenholz's rule) (Farenholz 1913). However, this seems increasingly unlikely. Indeed, more and more studies on different coevolved associations show that a strict Farenholz's rule is not respected, even when a high level of host specificity exists (e.g. Paterson and Banks 2001; Desdevises et al. 2002; Charleston and Perkins 2006). Topological incongruence between host and associate phylogenetic trees can result from processes like host switching, sorting events (extinction and lineage sorting), duplication events (speciation of the parasite independent of the host), and failure of the associate to diverge when the host diverges (“missing the boat”) (Page 1991; Page 1994; Page and Charleston 1998; Legendre et al. 2002; Charleston and Perkins 2006). © The Systematics Association 2012. |
| format |
Capítulo de Livro |
| author |
Cruaud, Astrid |
| spellingShingle |
Cruaud, Astrid Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| author2 |
Cook, James Da-Rong, Yang Genson, Gwenaélle S. Jabbour-Zahab, Roula Kjellberg, Finn Augusto Santinelo Pereira, Rodrigo Rønsted, Nina Santos-Mattos, Otilene Savolainen, Vincent Ubaidillah, Rosichon van Noort, Simon Yan-Qiong, Peng Rasplus, Jean Yves |
| author2Str |
Cook, James Da-Rong, Yang Genson, Gwenaélle S. Jabbour-Zahab, Roula Kjellberg, Finn Augusto Santinelo Pereira, Rodrigo Rønsted, Nina Santos-Mattos, Otilene Savolainen, Vincent Ubaidillah, Rosichon van Noort, Simon Yan-Qiong, Peng Rasplus, Jean Yves |
| title |
Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| title_short |
Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| title_full |
Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| title_fullStr |
Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Figfigwasp mutualism: The fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| title_sort |
figfigwasp mutualism: the fall of the strict cospeciation paradigm? |
| publisher |
The Systematics Association Special Volume 81: Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships |
| publishDate |
2020 |
| url |
https://repositorio.inpa.gov.br/handle/1/19916 |
| _version_ |
1787144914447892480 |
| score |
11.755432 |