The present study, considering the fact that nowadays we can not conceive the development
process decoupled from the idea of environmental protection and preservation, investigates
the principles, standards and administrative instruments and procedures of environmental law,
that ensure the preservation of environment and the compensation for the damage caused. The
Federal Constitution, in Article 225, caput, erected to the level of fundamental right the
ecologically and balanced environment, essential to a healthy quality of life. This fundamental
right to the environment is self-administered, indispensable, indivisible and inalienable,
imposing upon the Government, together with society, duty, and not mere power, to defend it
and preserve it for present and future generations. This study demonstrates that insofar as the
Constitution and other rules that make the legal duty to the State, also give it the means to do
it, in other words, the legal and financial resources it needs to meet expenses that will perform
these tasks. So, at the same time that the responsibilities and duties are given to the State, are
also given the power to tax. It can be said that the tax, primarily aims to raise funds, but can
also be an instrument used by the State to interfere in the economic domain, in order to
encourage or discourage certain practices or behaviors. This practice is known as
extrafiscality and it can provide a variety of purposes, including the protection and defense of
the environment, when, the tax is not only used to collect, but interfere on the economic
agents will inhibiting environmentally undesirable choices or even encouraging other
desirable under an environmental perspective. So, the stimulating functions or the
extrafiscality can be considered as an instrument of state for environmental conservation,
when the tax is used by the state to induce behaviors. At the end of this study, aiming to
highlight what is considered abstractly, the last chapter studies the species capable of
fulfilling such tax purposes and includes some examples that show the Brazilian normative
materialization of that form of taxation. Thus, we conclude that our laws admit extrafiscality
legally as skilled and effective disposal of the state for intervention in the economic domain
with the purpose of environmental protection and preservation.
|
