The restriction of the possibilities of access to a large production of evidence in administrative disciplinary process can characterize the practice of defensive bullying, capable of causing countless unnecessary litigations, contributing to the slowness of the judicial system, but that can be avoided if the Administration adopt rigid parameters control the observance of the principles and constitutional guarantees, v.g., which can be achieved by editing one, but appropriate normalization of the regency of the administrative disciplinary process, up based on hypothetical- deductive method, basic procedural manual can ensure members of processants commissions, even laymen, respect for constitutional dictates and therefore provide the soundness of administrative disciplinary procedure, and effective security to processed, avoiding any unnecessary litigations absolutely contributing reflexively to a reasonable duration of proceedings in progress, after the dignity of the human person.
|
