In the context of human rights protection, criminal victimization of
children as proof of motive is purpose of discussion involved the sciences, especially
the Law, Psychology and Social Work, thus leading to the analysis of evidentiary
production and their justifications. The research, after revisiting the literature on
childhood and the treatment she dispensed and the evidence system of criminal
procedure, studied the legal proceedings in which children were victims of crimes
against sexual dignity, by the courts in 2nd instance by State of Tocantins Court of
Justice. We used the methodological tools quantitative and qualitative, and the data
obtained from the survey of comparable procedural information and qualitative bias
by sampling the speeches of these processes and the relationship between the types
of proof on the grounds of the judgment were analyzed. It was also found the surface
arrangement between the involved sciences, which cheapens not only the quality of
the evidence, as well as child protection. The result points to the affirmation of a
procedural route that respects the human rights of victims in the use of evidence and
contribute to the effectiveness of judgments as a means of accountability of
perpetrators of crimes against children.
|
