The objective of this research is to analyze the effects of judicial cooperation between the
Federal and State Justice in the processing of delegated constitutional jurisdiction, with
emphasis on the State of Tocantins, from a judicial management proposal, which goes beyond
the conventional management model. reaching as a final milestone, an interactive and social
dialogue, where this communication conjures for a model of judicial interaction and a new
perspective of the exercise of the jurisdiction. Thus, in this dissertation, propositional and
interventional, judicial cooperation will be presented in a contemporary, managerial,
dialogued and democratic scenario, as well as a proposal to be a means of guaranteeing access
to justice based on the relationships that are established between the women. Justice structure
in Tocantins, according to a solidary participation, which goes beyond the sharing of
structures of judicial units and support in forensic acts. In this same context, the research
proposes to analyze the main causes of judicialization of social security benefits in Tocantins
and their effects on judicial activity. Along the same lines, the research will bring social
security law as a fundamental and human right, following the path of a qualitative,
bibliographical, explanatory and deductive and positivist method. In interdisciplinarity, the
philosophical interpretative exercise of the Hamasmas communicative theory and Immanuel
Kant's categorical imperative is accentuated by the analysis of the practical moral duty of
judicial cooperation in the various organs of the judiciary, considering the contemporary
unfolding of an increasingly interactive right, which is born. from a perspective of solidarity
and collaboration between divisions of the Justice structure.
|
