Monografia

A ética da responsabilidade perante os problemas ambientais: um diálogo entre Hans Jonas e Annie Leonard

The present work seeks to demonstrate Hans Jonas's ethical theory as a basis for a possible orientation for dealing with environmental problems. At first, we make a historical background to demonstrate how the technique became an ethical problem and caused several environmental problems, which...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Alves, Aline Aquino
Grau: Monografia
Idioma: pt_BR
Publicado em: Universidade Federal do Tocantins 2021
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: http://hdl.handle.net/11612/2990
Resumo:
The present work seeks to demonstrate Hans Jonas's ethical theory as a basis for a possible orientation for dealing with environmental problems. At first, we make a historical background to demonstrate how the technique became an ethical problem and caused several environmental problems, which are directly related to politics, economics and alienation of the population. Based on Annie Leonard's Story of Stuff (2011), we will demonstrate the intentionality of certain actions related to the use of technology and also the discourse about “sustainability” by large corporations globally, which have had negative consequences for the planet. It is in this context that the need for a new ethics arises, capable of discussing the new problems that traditional ethics did not foresaw. Therefore, in a second moment, we conceptualize Hans Jonas’s ethics of responsibility, presented in his work The principle of responsibility: an ethics for technological civilizations, which aims to impose limits on human actions in order to ensure the survival not only of human life on Earth, but of all species. We will highlight Jonas's criticism of traditional utopias, who affirmed that technology would lead human beings to progress and the current utopias, which affirms that through technology, all world’s problems could be solved, including environmental problems. We will demonstrate how technology assumes an ethical significance in it’s The Imperative of Responsibility, since it now occupies a central place in the subjective ends of human life. Finally, we evaluate whether Jonas's ethics of responsibility can sustain all the problems highlighted in this work and if it can lead us to a possible orientation for their solution. We conclude that it is important and necessary that these debates are held both in the political and popular spheres, because according to our research, it is from the moment that the population becomes aware of the seriousness of the matter that it is possible to generate a true knowledge of their condition and reality, making it easy to understand and accept the need to change human habits.