/img alt="Imagem da capa" class="recordcover" src="""/>
Literatura e ensino: alteridades e interseccionalidades na formação do leitor de textos literários
In this research, we discuss the importance of the teacher's mediating role in the teaching and learning of literature, in the sense of contributing to the formation of student readers with a view to entertainment, aesthetic enjoyment, human sensitivity and the construction of autonomy and dignit...
Autor principal: | Silva , Josiane de Almeida |
---|---|
Idioma: | pt_BR |
Publicado em: |
2022
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11612/4388 |
Resumo: |
---|
In this research, we discuss the importance of the teacher's mediating role in the teaching
and learning of literature, in the sense of contributing to the formation of student readers with
a view to entertainment, aesthetic enjoyment, human sensitivity and the construction of
autonomy and dignity in the exercise of citizenship. We consider that literature, in its main
objective, should provide an understanding of the effective role of alterity in the interaction of
people, the formation of readers, cultural diversity, gender, language, race, that is, the
intersectionalities inherent to the human being, such as aspects related to literature and to
teaching. Specifically, we conceived the proposal for the legal implementation of literary
education and literary literacy. In this sense, the theoretical contribution of the study highlights
the dialogical conception of language (BAKHTIN, 2009 [1929]); the transformations related to
reading and literature in Brazilian society (ARANA; KLEBIS, 2015); the humanizing and
sensitive power of literature (CANDIDO, 1972), literary literacy (COSSON, 2006), in addition
to Perrone-Moisés (2006), Zilberman (1989), Cosson (2006), Silva (2004) among other
authors and approaches related to the theme. Methodologically, we present a bibliographic-
documentary, highlighting official documents such as the National Curricular Parameters
(PCN), the Curriculum Guidelines for High School (OCNEM) and the National Curricular
Common Base (BNCC), for the work of literary education in basic education, aiming to gather
sufficient information about teaching practice, in accordance with what is proposed, above all,
in the national curriculum guidelines of teaching, in order to guarantee effectiveness in the
reading of the literary text and in the formation of sensitive, critical and reflective readers.
From the conclusions, we highlight the progressive erasure of Literature and the alleged
invisibility of certain aspects that lead to the continuity or intensification of problems in this
area (MENDES, 2020), as an important curricular component for an education that has as its
essential focus the formation of readers of aesthetic texts, in their different forms of literary
manifestation. Denying Literature is to distance students from reading different literary genres
that demonstrate human diversity in its cultural, historical, political, and social plurality, since
literary texts represent a set of knowledge (IPIRANGA, 2019) experienced by man throughout
its history, and (re)signified by language. |