This study is about the politic representation exerted by civil society in public politics council, considering that in these spaces happens participation through politic representation of civil society organizations. In that way, this work achieves a study about the politic representation exercise of four urban movements of national expression: National Confederation of Residents Association (NCRA); Popular Movements Central (PMC); National Movement of Housing Fight (NMHF) and National Union for Popular Housing (NUPH) in Cities Councils of Pará in management of 2008- 2010. This study has an objective to reflect how happens the process of these movements representation, authorization process, the links basing in movements consult process and politic actions installment in Council, how happens the formulation of politic proposition and the comprehension of representants about the counselors paper. It was achieved a field research using an interview technique as an instrumental, with nine counselors interviewed of four movements. This research certified that the authorization process of these movements is from the legitimacy of fight history defending the urban reform and that the choice of the representants is by indication; it has an effort to keep the link with the base of the movement, however, the consult relation and count installment happens between state coordinators of these movements, showing how fragile are these links. We realize that there is an articulation between the four movements in propositions formulated and in their defence, but that also there is a dispute between them for more affiliated entities.
|
