/img alt="Imagem da capa" class="recordcover" src="""/>
Dissertação
O protagonismo judicial e a ilegitimidade democrática da judicialização da política
This research is aimed at analyzing the Judiciary Power in a context wherein it acts as an agent amplifying its political dimension which brings about, as a consequence, a peculiar and unheard of type of public avenue of democratic participation. It has to do with the opening of a public space ar...
Autor principal: | VERBICARO, Loiane da Ponte Souza Prado |
---|---|
Grau: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Pará
2014
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: |
http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/4991 |
Resumo: |
---|
This research is aimed at analyzing the Judiciary Power in a context wherein it acts as an
agent amplifying its political dimension which brings about, as a consequence, a peculiar
and unheard of type of public avenue of democratic participation. It has to do with the
opening of a public space arising out of the augmentation in judicial activity, by way of an
increased expansion of the law, its procedures and institutions over politics and societal
framework of modern-day life, which allows for ampler access of citizens to the power
circles. Such changes in the political and institutional environment made it possible for a
more extended insertion of the Judiciary Power in essentially political matters, which came
to gain widespread acceptance as ´judicialization´ of politics and has been expressed by a
magnified importance and actual participation of the Judiciary Power in social, political and
economical life. Such phenomenon, typical of consolidated democracies, derived from
conditioning variables and peculiarities experienced in political, economical and social
order and brought about visible consequences in Brazilian democracy. The consequences of
said ´judicialization´ process of politics over the democratic opening vary in accordance
with the analytical focus being established as the theoretical reference point: the substantive
law-based current, as a defender of a more participatory Judiciary Branch; as opposed to
the procedural law-based current, which emphasizes majority processes for building of
political will in detriment to judicial ways. |