This thesis discusses the alternatives for the Transamazonica Road development, from studies
of the Non-Governmental Organization named Associação Solidária e Econômica de Frutas
da Amazônia (ASSEFA) that is responsible by the Projetos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável
(PDSs), in the municipal district of Anapu, Transamazônica, Pará State. It objectifies, verify
the images built about ASSEEFA and PDSs and, thus, point the participation civil society
degree of Anapu in the development alternative politicses formulation and implementation
process at that region. It objectifies, yet, turn explicit where field built the references to the
environment, present in the social actions locations fights. Do take like reference the concepts
introduced for Ammann (1978) and Bordenave (1994), we question the existence or not of
social participation in ASSEEFA's creation and in PDSs' implementation? In this sense, the
social categories participation, civil society, development, environment and Amazônia, with
latent reflexes in this region, were going selected like analysis central elements, what it is
accomplished soon in the first chapter. With the intent of offering at the height of the
objective answers above pointed, it analyzed, by means of bibliographical research and of
field, first moment, the constitution trajectory of ASSEEFA and of PDSs. It observed, thus,
that, in the partnerships, civil society disputes and negotiations, there were important
components that evidenced that those actions own directed proposals to a development type
that valorizes the environment and that, above all, it pledges with the citizenship ransom. The
points of view government institutions analysis like Instituto Nacional de Colonização e
Reforma Agrária (INCRA) and Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos
Naturais Renováveis (IBAMA) and lumbermen association representatives, it served like
reference for several possibilities comprehension, interests and conflicts with that are
introduced the civil society initiatives and the development accomplishment in
Transamazônica. We take like main hypothesis the formulation that the social participation in
ASSEEFA and in PDSs de Anapu is tied to more several interests and that this means a
breaking with old practices and visions on the development and the possibility of these
farming of warranty of her effective freedoms, as the right to land, to work, the education and
to the health, in short to the human being's fundamental rights.
|
