Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations

CEFALY, Daniela Francisca Gigo; BARATA, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves; TAPETY, Celiane Mary Carneiro; BRESCIANI, Eduardo; NAVARRO, Maria Fidela de Lima

Artigo

Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations

The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII – GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART r...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal:	CEFALY, Daniela Francisca Gigo
Outros Autores:	BARATA, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves, TAPETY, Celiane Mary Carneiro, BRESCIANI, Eduardo, NAVARRO, Maria Fidela de Lima
Grau:	Artigo
Idioma:	eng
Publicado em:	2015
Assuntos:	Tratamento dentário restaurador sem trauma Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Reparação de restauração dentária
Acesso em linha:	http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6969

id	ir-2011-6969
recordtype	dspace
spelling	ir-2011-69692018-02-21T16:22:48Z Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations Avaliação clínica de restaurações compostas ou complexas com a técnica do ART CEFALY, Daniela Francisca Gigo BARATA, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves TAPETY, Celiane Mary Carneiro BRESCIANI, Eduardo NAVARRO, Maria Fidela de Lima Tratamento dentário restaurador sem trauma Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Reparação de restauração dentária The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII – GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART restorations (30 with each material) were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two operators. After a period of 6 months, two independent examiners evaluated 59 restorations according to the criteria used in previous ART studies. Data were submitted to McNemar and Fischer tests. The success rate of the treatment was 98.3%. One restoration (Ketac Molar) was replaced by another material and was recorded as failure. The success rates of the restorations were 100% and 96.6% for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the restorations success between baseline and 6 months (p>0.05). In the same way, no significant differences were found between materials, cavity types or operators (p>0.05). The ART approach was highly appropriate and effective in restorations involving two or more tooth surfaces, after 6 months. The results showed a promising performance of the ART technique with both materials. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o comportamento de dois cimentos de ionômero de vidro: um de alta viscosidade (Ketac Molar - ESPE) e um modificado por resina (Fuji VIII – GC) em restaurações envolvendo duas ou mais superfícies dentárias, confeccionadas pela técnica do Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático. Sessenta restaurações (30 com cada material) foram inseridas em estudantes (9-16 anos) por dois operadores. Após 6 meses, dois examinadores independentes avaliaram as restaurações de acordo com os critérios utilizados em trabalhos prévios semelhantes. Os dados foram analisados pelos testes de McNemar e Fischer. A porcentagem de sucesso do tratamento foi de 98,3%. Uma restauração (Ketac Molar) foi substituída por outro material e classificada como falha. As porcentagens de sucesso das restaurações foram de 100% e 96,6% para o Fuji VIII e Ketac Molar, respectivamente. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante no sucesso das restaurações entre o baseline e 6 meses (p>0,05). Da mesma forma, não houve diferença estatística entre os materiais, tipos de cavidade ou entre operadores.(p>0,05). A técnica ART foi altamente apropriada e efetiva em restaurações envolvendo duas ou mais superfícies, após 6 meses. Os resultados mostraram um comportamento promissor com ambos os materiais. 2015-10-27T12:06:39Z 2015-10-27T12:06:39Z 2005-03 Artigo de Periódico CEFALY, Daniela Francisca Gigo et al. Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations. Journal of Applied Oral Science, Bauru, v. 13, n. 1, p. 15-19, mar. 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jaos/v13n1/23777.pdf>. Acesso em: 23 out. 2015. <http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572005000100004>. 1678-7765 http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6969 eng Acesso Aberto application/pdf
institution	Repositório Institucional - Universidade Federal do Pará
collection	RI-UFPA
language	eng
topic	Tratamento dentário restaurador sem trauma Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Reparação de restauração dentária
spellingShingle	Tratamento dentário restaurador sem trauma Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Reparação de restauração dentária CEFALY, Daniela Francisca Gigo Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
topic_facet	Tratamento dentário restaurador sem trauma Cimentos de ionômero de vidro Reparação de restauração dentária
description	The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of two different glass-ionomer cements: a high-density (Ketac Molar - ESPE) and a resin-modified cement (Fuji VIII – GC) using the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment technique to restore multisurface cavities in permanent teeth. A total of 60 ART restorations (30 with each material) were placed in schoolchildren (9-16 years of age) by two operators. After a period of 6 months, two independent examiners evaluated 59 restorations according to the criteria used in previous ART studies. Data were submitted to McNemar and Fischer tests. The success rate of the treatment was 98.3%. One restoration (Ketac Molar) was replaced by another material and was recorded as failure. The success rates of the restorations were 100% and 96.6% for Fuji VIII and Ketac Molar, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in the restorations success between baseline and 6 months (p>0.05). In the same way, no significant differences were found between materials, cavity types or operators (p>0.05). The ART approach was highly appropriate and effective in restorations involving two or more tooth surfaces, after 6 months. The results showed a promising performance of the ART technique with both materials.
format	Artigo
author	CEFALY, Daniela Francisca Gigo
author2	BARATA, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves TAPETY, Celiane Mary Carneiro BRESCIANI, Eduardo NAVARRO, Maria Fidela de Lima
author2Str	BARATA, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves TAPETY, Celiane Mary Carneiro BRESCIANI, Eduardo NAVARRO, Maria Fidela de Lima
title	Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
title_short	Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
title_full	Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
title_fullStr	Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
title_full_unstemmed	Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations
title_sort	clinical evaluation of multisurface art restorations
publishDate	2015
url	http://repositorio.ufpa.br/jspui/handle/2011/6969
_version_	1832603758591213568
score	11.755432

Clinical evaluation of multisurface ART restorations

Registros relacionados