This research aims to study the schooling and the professionalization in the socio-educational area. Its general objective is the analyze of how the schooling and the professionalization happens with socio-educators in Para State, in order to understand the implications of the traditional punitive system and Restorative Justice in socio-education. The thesis that guided the research is that schooling and professionalization in both the punitive system and restorative justice are in favor of capital as a form of social control and serve to discipline, educate and "mold" the socio-educators in the processes of social reinsertion. The procedures sought to understand how legislation aimed at socio-education directs the period of fulfillment of the socio-educational measure to a type of schooling and professionalization, where the work, within the capitalist logic, appears as the best and / or the only alternative to the infraction of the law. Based on the studies of Marx (2008, 2009, 2011); Engels (2008, 2010); Mészáros (1987, 2002, 2003, 2008 ); Poulatnzas (1980); Araújo (2008, 2011), Araújo e Rodrigues (2009, 2010, 2013, 2014), Frigotto (2003; 2006; 2007; 2009); Saviani (2006; 2008; 2009, 2014, 2016); Silva (2005;2006); Wacquant (2002, 2015); Melossi e Pavarini (2010); Rosenblatt (2014; 2014a; 2014b) besides others, this reference had allowed the dialogue with empirical and documentary data based on the Dialectical and Historical Materialism method of studying, in the conception that the investigative processes are articulated for a qualitative analysis of understanding of the social phenomenon, in its historicity and totality. The research locus was the Socio-Educational Foundation of Pará - Fasepa, in the Metropolitan Region of Belém/ PA, with observation in the 3rd Childhood and Youth Court of Belém. The participant observation was adopted; the semi-structured interview; The questionnaire application; as well as the Data found on the websites of the institutions surveyed. The results revealed that Restorative Justice is sometimes referred to as a paradigm, sometimes as a methodology for resolving conflicts used in criminal and non-criminal matters, especially in the care of young people in conflict with the law. One of its main characteristics is the association of the community (civil society) as a partner of both the judiciary and the intuitions responsible for the implementation of socio-educational measures of deprivation of liberty (Semi privacy and Internment). It was concluded that young people, in compliance with socio-educational measures, mostly from the working class, have an inverted inclusion in the processes of resocialization through schooling and professionalization. The State only develops inclusion actions after infractions being committed, which means, the inclusion of these young people in the socio-education, associated with inclusion in the world of work, fulfills the purpose of disciplining (punitive character) and control of the work forces, aiming at the Capitalist production. However, the use of restorative techniques, despite the methodological form adopted, which reproduces the logic of capital, especially when it tries to "frame" the young people in compliance with socio-educational measures to the rules of conduct, "(re) adapting them" to social interaction, can be a useful tool for professionals of the justice system for a more humanized service.
|
