/img alt="Imagem da capa" class="recordcover" src="""/>
Dissertação
Parfor presencial e relações federativas no Tocantins: condições necessárias a permanência de professores-estudantes
This Master's Dissertation has as its theme the National Training Plan for Basic Education Teachers (PARFOR Presential) and the federal relations in Tocantins to guarantee the necessary conditions for the permanence of teacher-students. Its objective is to analyze how the relations between the Un...
Autor principal: | Nascimento, Patrícia Rezende do |
---|---|
Grau: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | pt_BR |
Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins
2018
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11612/1053 |
Resumo: |
---|
This Master's Dissertation has as its theme the National Training Plan for Basic Education
Teachers (PARFOR Presential) and the federal relations in Tocantins to guarantee the
necessary conditions for the permanence of teacher-students. Its objective is to analyze how
the relations between the Union - through MEC / CAPES / FNDE and UFT, the State -
through SEDUC and FEPAD - TO, and Municipalities of Tocantins - through UNDIME, of
collaboration, and the actions of guaranteeing the necessary conditions for the permanence of
teachers-students, workers of schools of the municipal public network through these relations,
for the development of PARFOR Presential. This is a qualitative research, with information
collected through bibliographic review and documentary analysis. As results, it demonstrates
that, contrary to what was formally proposed, the relations established between the federated
entities União, Tocantins State and Municipalities, through its institutions and its organs, was
not characterized as a collaboration regime. The punctual and fragmented agreement resulted
in the conflict of interests and the deconcentration of tasks and roles in the launching of
actions to guarantee the conditions of permanence of teachers-students workers of
Municipalities in the courses of PARFOR Presential offered by the University. As a
conclusion, it reinforces the need for a qualified debate about the collaboration regime,
revealing conflicts of interest surrounding the idea that the regime already exists, demanding
only its improvement, and even addressing its possibilities in the Brazilian State. |