Proletariado e precariado: um debate teórico no mundo do trabalho.
The main objective of the article is to identify the various perspectives of the proletariat's definitions by looking in detail at their approach to precarious work within the world of work. To analyze the main definitions of work and their centrality, seeking specifically to analyze the main def...
| Autor principal: | Sousa, Arthur Gomes de |
|---|---|
| Grau: | Monografia |
| Idioma: | pt_BR |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Federal do Tocantins
2023
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: |
http://hdl.handle.net/11612/5241 |
| Resumo: |
|---|
|
The main objective of the article is to identify the various perspectives of the
proletariat's definitions by looking in detail at their approach to precarious work within
the world of work. To analyze the main definitions of work and their centrality, seeking
specifically to analyze the main definitions of work and their centrality, to detail some
definitions about the proletariat and to discuss their importance in the world of work
and to verify the different types of conceptualizations brought by specific authors
about the characterization of the precariat. The work methodology for text
development was centered on a qualitative descriptive research, with bibliographic
review. First there is a conceptualization of what would really work its origins beyond
the types and their respective influences and meanings for the human being. Within
this environment the article makes a brief discussion about two concepts within the
world of work: the proletariat and the precariat.Subsequently, the proletariat and its
processes of construction and definition are defined over time in an environment of
struggle and persecution within the capitalist world. Another subject mentioned in the
article is precariousness and its types of characterization, facing unemployment, and
social rights exclusions. And from the discussions about the worked theme it is
understood that the proletariat is a much more defined class today and yet still
suffers the same attributions as the precarious category, where both categories are
only etymologically separated within their conceptual representativeness. |