This paper seeks to understand what factors influence a public policy for leisure
in the projects developed by the Secretary of State for Sport and Leisure
(SEDEL) to the city of Macapá, the following objectives: to investigate and
characterize the existing leisure projects in SEDEL; analyze the concepts of
leisure in the same check and citizen participation in relation to projects, aimed
at establishing an understanding of public policies for leisure from the (design of
leisure, participation and development of this policy), in a dialectical
perspective. Public policy is the means through which society ensures the social
right, in this case leisure. But these possibilities are only successful when the
public policy part of State and Society in a co-management. However, these
actions are still characterized by the total dominance of the State, namely, the
centralization of policy decisions about leisure. The historical and dialectical
materialism, this research examines the reference object in different ways,
studying the origin and development of events in a spiral shape from the
historical point of view, that this way the reflections related to the object of study
is understood in its entirety. The procedures, tools and research techniques
were used: document analysis, which involved the following steps (pre-analysis,
initial reading, interpretation and exploitation of the document), the interview
with questions of content exploration applied to employees of the institution
subject _ research and field journal (which included the observation and
reflections registered) based on theoretical and methodological framework
enabling some considerations on the subject. The study shows that public
policies for leisure in the city of Macapá need to understand: the relaxation in its
scope, and real importance to the people, popular participation as part of this
process gives the possibility of interventions to overcome the centralization of
decisions (from top to bottom) that public policy and more leisure activities that
run, the need to tender to obtain a permanent staff and investment in continuing
training for leisure. And also believes that these appointments need to get to the
change of public education for leisure.
|
