This study addressed the Executive-Legislative relations in Pará through Bill 01/2008 implantaria that the Superintendency of Participative Territorial Planning (SPTP), during the 16th Legislature of the Legislative Assembly of Pará in the period 2007-2010. Prepared by the State Government, the project included the establishment of an institution that would coordinate the process of popular participation and social control proposed by the government Ana Júlia Carepa early in his administration. How problematic, the study addressed the rejection by parliament to that project, whose research question was: what factors contributed to the rejection of the project of creating the SPTP by the Legislature? Moreover, what it means in Executive-Legislative relations according to the current literature. The hypotheses would be inferred that the rejection was motivated by the conflicting relationship between the Executive and Legislature in the parliamentary arena or the perception of conflict of interest of local political actors as to the boundaries of performance between political institutions and participatory representative political institutions. Members opposed to the project did not consider SPTP while effective practice democratic management, but suspected the same, for example, could be linked to strategies by the Executive for electoral purposes or bargaining before the Legislature. The development of the research has focused on the search for answers to issues presented and to verify the validity of the hypothesis inferred. As for the goal we evaluated the behavior of MPs in the course of the project to create the SPTP. As research tools were used and empirical literature searches.
|
