This dissertation discusses the subject of the corporal manifestations,
mainly the hysterical conversion. The initial proposal is of doing a brief course in the
Freudian work and his successors, with intention of delimiting the subject of the
hysteria, and to look for the statute of the body in psychoanalysis, as well as, that
which affects it. For the psychoanalysis, the body is conceived not only as a
biological body, but also as erogenous body, available and inhabited for pulsion. This
body, that is rendered to the action of the pulsions, is a plastic body, capable to be
for purposes different with relationship to the psychic economy. For this reason, it is
necessary to consider that there are double ways of corporal, two clinical slopes: the
symptom hysterical conversive and the psychosomatic phenomenon. How to
distinguish both? How to know if we are in front of a symptom of hysterical
conversion or of a corporal phenomenon of psychosomatic order? To understand
that double ways of corporal wins relevance when we needed to lead the treatment.
For that, it is necessary to know to distinguish the psychosomatic phenomenon of the
corporal manifestations of symptomatic order, in other words, hysterical conversion.
Thus, we will try to confront those two corporal affection that, in spite of if they
manifest in the body, they obey different logics. This quarrel opens space for the
retaken of the pulsion concept, which is the connection point on the two clinical
subjects approached. This dissertation makes us to think about the clinic, and about
as the individuals they are used of theirs bodies, before a suffering of the order of the
unbearable.
|
