This study aims to understand the phenomenon of voluntary return to the conditional
cash transfer "BolsaFamilia". This study is based on the critical-dialectical theory,
uses the categories of social policy, social work, empowerment / autonomy,
citizenship, income transfers and poverty. The method adopted is dialectical, from
which the case study with in-depth interviews will be adopted. The data were
processed through content analysis that consists of "an investigation technique that
aims at objective, systematic and quantitative description of the manifest content of
communication" from systematic and objective procedures to describe the content of
the messages, indicators (quantitative or otherwise) that allow the inference of
knowledge concerning the conditions of production / reception (inferred variables) of
these messages and the quantitative aspects of the method. The BolsaFamília
program has brought benefits to the target audience, the volume of information
leaves no doubt, however the cases studied indicate that the return of the benefit of
this program did not occur spontaneously, but stimulated without that beneficiaries
were effectively emancipated. Thus there was voluntary but lock cancellation,
guidance and induced output. Some families were detected by the program system
and were automatically blocked because they are nonstandard income to continue
receiving the benefit; others were detected at the time of re-registration. As for this
shutdown, the positioning of the people interviewed was divided between those who
understood that still needed a lot of money to continue the improvement of their lives;
and those that have not even request the shutdown of the spontaneous coordination
of the program form, agreed with institutional procedures, because they understand
that other needy people need the opportunity generated by this policy.
|
