This study seeks to elucidate the disputes between dominant work and ontological work, since
when human evolution is portrayed in a historical panorama there is a clash between
domination and liberation, therefore, one corrupts the being while the other socializes one's
own. It is with this perception of primary socialization that the peasant family assumes the
responsibility of educating by inserting ontological work in their offices. Considering this
review, it is concluded that the domineering work establishes the depreciation of reality and
the strangeness among individuals, unlike the formation work in childhood, which has the
capacity to socialize and educate the child, but also prepare it for a recognized reality. This
research was based on the qualitative exemplary calculation, which was carried out from a
bibliographic review, characteristic of a descriptive research.
|
