/img alt="Imagem da capa" class="recordcover" src="""/>
Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Graduação
A Inconstitucionalidade da tributação sobre livros, periódicos, jornais e papéis destinados à sua impressão: uma análise acerca das implicações geradas pelo Projeto de Lei nº 3.887/2020
The tax immunity of books, newspapers, periodicals, and paper used in its printings is provided by Brazilian legal system since 1946 and was maintained on the current constitutional text to insure certain fundamental rights, such as the freedom of speech, the manifestation of thought, the access...
Autor principal: | LAMEIRA, Fernanda Garcia |
---|---|
Grau: | Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso - Graduação |
Publicado em: |
2022
|
Assuntos: | |
Acesso em linha: |
https://bdm.ufpa.br:8443/jspui/handle/prefix/4746 |
Resumo: |
---|
The tax immunity of books, newspapers, periodicals, and paper used in its printings is provided by
Brazilian legal system since 1946 and was maintained on the current constitutional text to insure
certain fundamental rights, such as the freedom of speech, the manifestation of thought, the access
to education and the dissemination of culture. From this, as the years went by the tax immunity has
been expanded to cover digital books, sticker albums, and etc.; and also, to be projected on PIS/COFINS
contributions, in accordance with the law no. 10.865/04. However, on November 7, 2020, the current
Economy Minister presented a bill to revoke the zero PIS and COFINS tax rate on books, newspapers,
periodicals, and paper used in its printings, raising questions about the constitutionality of the
measure. By doing so, the proposed law run counter to the current trend in case law and legislation to
extend tax immunity and constitute a downright violation of the above-mentioned fundamental rights,
as the increase in payment of taxes or contributions over books, newspapers and periodicals makes it
difficult to exercise the freedom of speech or the dissemination of culture, for instance. In addition,
the bill no. 3.887/2020 should be regarded as unconstitutional for it violates the principle of seal to
social regression because represents a setback in the implementations and concretization of the
mentioned rights. |